Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Taken\s+out\s+of\s+Context\s+\-\s+Cleanliness\s+of\s+Old\s+Rigs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Taken\s+out\s+of\s+Context\s+\-\s+Cleanliness\s+of\s+Old\s+Rigs\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Taken out of Context - Cleanliness of Old Rigs (score: 1): Author: terry foskey via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:14:24 +0000 (UTC); Rick, My comments regarding old rigs were taken out of context, my thesis remains, "Most any modern rig is cleaner than the rigs of old" Sure you may point to some exceptions, perhaps some military; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00276.html (9,174 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Taken out of Context - Cleanliness of Old Rigs (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:48:18 +0100; Terry, you are twisting my words. I did not say all past tube rigs were better than today's rigs. I only compared one of today's worst radios to yesteryear's cleanest radio - which was 50 years ago -; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00287.html (10,449 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]