Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Technical\s+Correspondence\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Technical\s+Correspondence\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:32:38 -0500; "Hands off perspective?" My perspective is a bit different. This is one of the most "hands on" reflectors I've ever been on. Go back and read all the Omni VI and VI+ threads from a few years back. Ju; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00371.html (11,141 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1): Author: Henry Mackey <kb9cqo@embarqmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:42:17 -0400 (EDT); Hello TenTec group, Well for my money, and that is what it comes down to in this shack, I buy a product to use not to improve. All of my ham friends in this area have HF rigs made in other places tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00372.html (10,727 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1): Author: Mike Gorniak <mgorniak@genesiswireless.us>; Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:28:12 -0500; As long as Ten Tec is going to employ software as an integral part of their product line, I support discussing it on this reflector. Many contributions on the subject come from people that would not; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00374.html (9,188 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rwd@iteris.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:32:36 -0400; The arguments for and against open software sourcing have raged for years, and are not likely to be resolved here, it seems to me. Suffice to say that eloquent arguments can be made for both sides an; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00378.html (10,030 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]