Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Omni\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Omni\'s\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: "Bill DeVore" <wdevore199@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:46:52 -0500; Can anyone briefly explain the main differences between the following Ten-Tecs: Omni A Omni A series B Omni D Omni D series B Thanks in advance Bill WB3DLO ___________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00534.html (6,432 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:19:56 -0500; The only difference between the Omni A and Omni D is the digital frequency display (Omni D) verses the analog display (Omin D). The series B came out and added a new filter board with 2 optional posi; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00535.html (8,122 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 14:18:47 -0500; Omni A is an ANALOG display Omni D is a DIGITAL display Omni D series B and series C are upgraded Omni D's. Each version had a different MODEL number. Check the "Unofficial TenTec" website for more i; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00554.html (8,116 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:38:52 -0500; What's the Omni C inrelation to these? Omni A is an ANALOG display Omni D is a DIGITAL display Omni D series B and series C are upgraded Omni D's. Each version had a different MODEL number. Check the; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00568.html (9,118 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:50:52 -0500; The Omni C, is a digital only version that added the warc bands and more RIT, XIT options over the series B Omni's. You might call it an Omni D series C, although it was never officially called that.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00570.html (10,288 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:53:05 -0500; So the OmniC was not a D series C but came after the D series C? N1JM The Omni C, is a digital only version that added the warc bands and more RIT, XIT options over the series B Omni's. You might cal; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00571.html (10,877 bytes)
7. RE: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: n1eu@netscape.net (Barry N1EU); Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:07:56 -0500; No, the Omni C IS the D series C, but it was called the Omni C. 73, Barry N1EU __________________________________________________________________ Switch to Netscape Internet Service. As low as $9.95; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00573.html (8,291 bytes)
8. RE: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:18:24 -0500; This is getting as bad as "who's on first". :) Ron Wb1hga No, the Omni C IS the D series C, but it was called the Omni C. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00577.html (8,079 bytes)
9. RE: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:23:07 -0500; Of course then there is the OmniA and OmniA series B. But I think we have all gone through this before.:-). John N1JM This is getting as bad as "who's on first". :) Ron Wb1hga No, the Omni C IS the D; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00578.html (8,747 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: Al Scanandoah <k2zn@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:08:56 -0500; Yup, the "plain" Omni A is the one with the squelch control. Some day, I'll make better use of that pot on my Omni A - probably a variable notch filter. Al, K2ZN John L Merrill wrote: Of course then; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00585.html (9,784 bytes)
11. RE: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:41:03 -0500; And who was it that thought the ICOM PRO PROII PROIII PROIII.5 etc. was such a big deal? N4LQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00586.html (9,177 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]