Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Transceiver\s+Survey\s*$/: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:58:07 EDT
Tom, Why in the world would you want to pay for firmware updates to fix a product that you have and still is not right? I am not talking about optional features here. Just curious where you are commi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00262.html (9,206 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Jim" <pywacker@fuse.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:01:50 -0400
' Tom, Why in the world would you want to pay for firmware updates to fix a product that you have and still is not right? I am not talking about optional features here. Just curious where you are com
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00263.html (9,822 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:13:31 -0400
Lee, No you are not missing anything. It is correct that I have paid for the radio and have a resonable expectation of some good firmware. Guess what I am saying is that I would pay for some top-of-
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00264.html (9,729 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:29:40 EDT
Tom, You explained it well.. OK, now that makes sense and I agree I might also be interested....but remember if you get 3rd party firmware and they go to live at South Beach.. you are stuck right the
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00265.html (9,065 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:37:54 -0400
Beach.. you are You do have a point there... 73 Tom AA4VV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tente
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00266.html (8,634 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Arthur Lewis" <wa8vsj@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:41:02 -0400
Scott Where do we get a copy of the survey? Would like to add some comments to transceiver items that I think should be in the Orion. I have an Orion and a Omni VI. Really enjoy them, but anything co
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00267.html (11,321 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Merle Bone" <merlebone@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:48:41 -0500
I think the issue of "paying for upgrades" is an interesting one. I would be happy to pay for firmware upgrades, either on an individual basis - like it / buy it - or on an annual subscription basis.
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00270.html (9,799 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Joe W2KJ" <w2kj@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:45:52 -0400
I have an Orion that I really enjoy using....it was the best radio I had ever owned until I got my Elecraft K3. There have been a bunch of firmware and DSP updates for the K3...sometimes only a week
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00271.html (9,272 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:56:10 EDT
Merle, One reason... If the radio was doing what it needs to do, correctly.. no firmware upgrade needed. Like in the old days before firmware.. it had to be right in the hardware. Now Mfg's ( lot's o
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00272.html (8,889 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "fraz1" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:00:30 -0500
Interesting Joe. I have sold my K3. I prefer my Orion. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00273.html (10,497 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:03:27 -0500
I don't think the concept was to pay for fixes, but to pay for new firmware functions. However, after some period of time, it might be reasonable to charge for ongoing "support" much like many softwa
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00274.html (10,429 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Rick Williams <ve7asr@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Joe I could not have said it better. I have announced here and directly to Ten-Tec that, in my opinion, the Orion firmware has some significant problems. Unfortunately I DON'T have the luxury of owni
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00276.html (11,062 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: K5XS@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:49:55 EDT
Rick, Please believe that I am truly not trying to be argumentative here. But I truly wonder what you mean. What "full potential" is the Orion II not reaching? Are there some specific performance par
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00277.html (9,320 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Rick Williams <ve7asr@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Fair question Bernie. Yes I am using an Orion (565). I have the luxury to be able to operate BOTH Version 2 and Version 1 firmware. Version 2 has the benefit of a sharper display and a functioning sw
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00280.html (10,536 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "John" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:49:58 -0500
Hi Rick...et al.... I took Scott's message this morning as a positive sign. Improving existing gear before producing new gear. Fingers crossed here. I did, in fact, sell my K3. I like my Orion. _____
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00281.html (12,153 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing AA6E <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:00:25 -0400
Put me down as one Orion owner who would pay a reasonable amount for a maintenance contract that would cover hardware repairs and/or firmware updates. As someone involved in software development, I m
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00282.html (9,240 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:01:46 -0400
It doesn't pay to think too deeply on that question.. I thought about it and since it said "on" and not "in," I listed the most obvious thing ON the front panel... A large ergonomic tuning knob! :-)
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00284.html (10,590 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:29:15 -0500
I completed the survey with reasonable ease. Had to back up a couple of times to see what or how I answered a previous question. In reading and looking at the comments about the survey this evening,
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00285.html (9,657 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:35:42 -1000
The blue and white background stripes really are an improvement. Thanks for listening! DE N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00286.html (10,245 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:42:06 +0300
I don't see it at all. What I see is that someone from Ten-Tec has been quitely reading the discussions we've had since the announcment of the OII on firmware. Now that they are no longer spending al
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00287.html (9,938 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu