Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Transceiver\s+Survey\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Transceiver\s+Survey\s*$/: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:03:48 -0400; I would like to see all the manufacturers begin moving away from the 1980s black "VCR" look. I'm not sure how all that started, but we need to end it now. Some of the classiest-looking equipment I've; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00315.html (11,381 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:36:51 -0400; Gary You got a bad fan in your Argo V. Happens sometimes. Ron K3MIY I'm wondering how accurate this survey will be. After all, they are pretty much focused on the Ten Tec crowd. If I didn't own a Ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00317.html (11,599 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:39:39 EDT; I still think my Collins S line looks very PRO and very Classy...and it works as new today... Of course I use a Orion II for crowded conditions/contesting... 73, Lee ** Need a new ride? Check out the; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00318.html (8,570 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: "Perry W. Remaklus" <Perry@willbell.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:44:42 -0400; Greetings, I agree. Get it thought our before you begin to write code. Most of the time and work will be in the thinking stage. Perry W1COW What I would like to see is an open process for writing a d; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00319.html (10,465 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:56:58 -0600; Then it makes for much happier customers to take the time to be sure the code does ALL the thought out performance before the customer sees the code. Whipping out changes and shipping the same day le; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00320.html (10,277 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: "Gary D Krause" <n7hts@bresnan.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:45:19 -0600; No, I didn't have a bad fan on my Argo. I don't like having my computer on in my shack for the same reason. I suppose my hearing is a little more sensitive to those frequecies. Gary, N7HTS __________; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00325.html (12,524 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: Martin Ewing AA6E <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:21:50 -0400; Perry & Rick, I suppose "requirements -- specifications -- coding -- testing -- release" would be a good model for software. This methodology works nicely with simpler non-SDR rigs. The firmware of; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00340.html (10,766 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:13:40 -0400; Martin Ewing AA6E writes... There is nothing about a properly constructed systems engineering process that prevents iteration. But also recognize that those who want a true SDR in the sense of a comp; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00343.html (12,669 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:09:05 -0600; I, and I suspect many VHF/UHF enthusiasts, would like to see a 222MHz (1.25m) rig, or a VHF/UHF rig that incorporates this band. As 222 MHz is only available in region 1, it is pretty much up to the; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00348.html (9,297 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:26:15 -0600; But it needs a state of the art receiver. A VHF receiver with a 10 dB NF was state of the art at the beginning of UHF TV, not today. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00349.html (9,824 bytes)
71. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:36:10 -0500; Paul, I have actually had my hands on a beautiful Blue Anodized Hilberling transceiver. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00351.html (9,635 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:23:20 -0500; For VHF and UHF I am a fan of transverters and high performance HF transceivers. Noise figures of less then 0.5 dB are the order of the day for 144 MHz and 432 MHz. I use DownEast transverters ahead; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00353.html (11,281 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 72
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]