Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Website\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Website\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 23:22:46 -0600; I'm not really upset at all. And mostly retract my rant, having finally seen the recommendation for 1024x728 resolution. The site looked really ugly -- almost childish, based on the errors in its di; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00067.html (8,028 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 23:42:07 -0600; Hmmm ... I probably spoke too soon. Even at 1024x768 some pages don't work, I suppose because of the style sheet and tables issue. This isn't a dis ... But ... Especially for a commercial site, it ou; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00068.html (9,373 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 05:55:50 -0000; their These are TT standards? on page. A possibility ? Have you looked at the source ? In any event, it is tremendously better than the old stuff. _______________________________________________ TenT; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00069.html (10,785 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:06:10 +0000; The discussion about the new site follows the standard NIT-PICK which so many like to do. Amazing how many experts we have here about everything. kc4atu ______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00075.html (7,792 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: Jeff Camp <jcamp2@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:29:00 -0600; For what it's worth, I like the new web site. It looks better to me than the old one. I haven't run into any problems with resolution or display in IE or Firefox, but if I do it won't matter because; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00077.html (8,558 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "Caitlyn M. Martin" <mizuhoradio@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 05:51:17 -0800 (PST); I have to agree with Jeff. They did a really nice job. 73, Caity K7VO == Caitlyn M. Martin - K7VO http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/k7vo Blog: http://k7vo.blogspot.com ARRL QRP-ARCI #11018 ARS #445; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00079.html (7,985 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:09:57 -0500; And I thought it was solved!! Again, next topic, please? Ron Wb1hga kc4atu _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00081.html (8,347 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "Wes Attaway (N5WA)" <n5wa@sport.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:15:08 -0600; I just checked the page in question and it looks fine here, exactly the same on both IE6 and Firefox. Hmmm ... I probably spoke too soon. Even at 1024x768 some pages don't work, I suppose because of; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00082.html (11,634 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "Scott / W4PJ" <w4pj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:29:10 -0500; Nit Picking can cost alot for a company rolling out a new website. Alpha and beta testers and focus groups are big business. Also 99 precent of the website users aren't "experts." T-T has a great FRE; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00083.html (8,730 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "David S.McCallum" <w7sac2@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:43:37 -0600; I've been watching all this about the new Orion site and is that just for updates on the Orion or all inputs?. I enjoy reading and following all the info on this rig, don't have one but like to stay; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00084.html (10,375 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: Mike Manship <mjmanship@iquest.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:52:07 -0500; Quoting ron <roncasa@verizon.net>: It's also amazing how many self-appointed moderators exist here . W9OJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com htt; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00085.html (8,494 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: Martin AA6E <msembx-aa6e@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 06:54:11 -0800 (PST); David, The Ten-Tec web site we've been talking about is the company's own site, www.tentec.com, with product specs and on-line store. This mailing list is for open discussion, mostly among TT users,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00086.html (8,794 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "David S.McCallum" <w7sac2@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:52:57 -0600; Hey Thanks a lot Martin got it all saved and book marked. Appreciate the info and glad I asked the question, David/Mac. David, The Ten-Tec web site we've been talking about is the company's own site,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00089.html (9,783 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Website (score: 1): Author: "holladayfd" <holladayfd@multipro.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:38:08 -0600; Scott, Remember that "ex" from the Latin means out of or in the past and spert is just a drip under presure. 73, Frank, K4VMO the that _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00093.html (9,554 bytes)
15. [TenTec] TEN-TEC Website (score: 1): Author: John Henry <jshenry1963@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 08:38:01 -0500; Looks like the TEN-TEC website has transitioned over to the new company. Check it out. http://www.tentec.com/ 73, KI4JPL John Henry _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-05/msg00131.html (7,277 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC Website (score: 1): Author: md.schatzberg@gmail.com; Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:46:54 -0400; Hello John, I notice that the Orion II 566 is not listed as a supported radio. I need a K6 Reed Relay for the A1 low pass filter board. Do they provide part information if the relay is unavailable? T; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-05/msg00133.html (7,521 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC Website (score: 1): Author: Neil Martinsen-Burrell <neilmartinsenburrell@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:39:36 -0500; The email address service@tentec.com is being actively monitored for service inquiries. Many people have successfully gotten work done on their radios, but I don't know if the staffing situation is s; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-05/msg00137.html (9,462 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC Website (score: 1): Author: <w9oj@indy.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 10:44:51 -0400; Page has nothing on it except for the word tentec.com _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-05/msg00138.html (8,238 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC Website (score: 1): Author: Louis Ciotti <lciotti1@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 10:48:09 -0400; Something is funky about it. The address was being redirected to a specific port on a sever earlier when I checked the site. I wonder if they are trying to use an in house server with a dynamic dns s; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-05/msg00139.html (9,082 bytes)
20. [TenTec] TEN-TEC Website (score: 1): Author: John Henry <jshenry1963@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:49:29 -0500; Yeah, I think it is down. Hopefully he can get it back going, but I don't know if he kept it on his own server, if he did he will get it running when he gets back home from Dayton, or if he has it ho; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-05/msg00140.html (8,374 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]