- 1. [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:59:39 -0400
- Come-on. As I read what happened, the guy returned one Orion (per TT's return policy) and then wrote an unfavorable report on the equipment. If they were afraid he was some kind of a nut-job whey did
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00916.html (7,623 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:21:27 -0400
- Actually it was a Jupiter he returned and that was two years ago. He did not have a history of abuse of the return policy from what I understand. It did seem to be personal as the negative post on eh
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00917.html (8,484 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:42:26 -0500
- return policy) and then wrote an unfavorable report on the equipment. If they were afraid he was some kind of a nut-job whey didn't they say to him "Ok, but this time we're not going to let you retur
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00930.html (8,436 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: K4IA@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:40:09 EDT
- Agreed - it didn't look like he abused the policy to me either. But, we haven't heard TT's side of the story. If you have a 30 day return policy, you should honor it PERIOD. Honor it with a smile and
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00950.html (8,231 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: "Ken & Linda Burrough" <w8keb@1st.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:19:45 -0400
- The 30 day return policy is not anything I need to buy a radio. If I want it I will buy it with or with out the 30 day return policy. What I can not stand is any one or any company trying to put thei
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00954.html (9,349 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: Randy K7RAN <k7randy@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:36:26 -0600
- Freedom of speech also extends to Ten-Tec's freedom not to be forced to engage in a commercial contract with someone with whom they disagree. The fellow who posted the negative opinions about Ten-Tec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00957.html (9,268 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:13:33 -0400
- I believe what Ken is saying, although in a different way, is that in this case it could be considered as an attempt to supress Freedom of Speech, in that the action by TT citing a negative post on E
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00965.html (11,617 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <n4nt_m_o_hyder@charter.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:14:49 -0400
- I agree with Randy and would add the following: Senator Dick Durbin was very quick to assume the worst about our servicemen at Gitmo and call them names by comparison. I have dealt with Ten-Tec long
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00966.html (10,414 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott / W4PJ" <w4pj@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:26:57 -0400
- At least someone finally addressed the question I posed earlier instead of attacking the messenger. Thanks Toby. PEACE Scott - the other one... not the "nice" one. this TT products.....therefore issu
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00989.html (9,411 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:18:29 -0500
- A good thoughtful post, I'd have to say though, the black listing like this in business goes on frequently, Recently, Dallas city went to Ford Motor company to purchase a large number of new Crown V
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00997.html (8,894 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu