Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+Advertizing\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: "M. Todd Miskel" <foamhand@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 07:05:44 -0600
Hello all, this probably won't get posted as I am not a member of the list and my last thread on TT and the rest of us got skipped over, but here goes... First of all, I love Ten Tec for 2 reasons...
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00189.html (8,892 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Close" <rclose@nhwisp.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:29:36 -0400
I look at the Ten Tec way a little differently. If I wanted an Icom I would buy one, and the same goes for the other rice-rigs. If I wanted a home-stereo styled rig I would buy rice. If I wanted a ra
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00192.html (11,520 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:34:16 -0400
I have a bunch of Ten Tecs myself. I love them!! But... for very different reasons then most everyone else here. I like the early '70s "feel" of the rigs. Big analog S meter, large display, no menus,
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00194.html (9,991 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Hughes" <roger.h@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:45:06 -0500
Well Todd. I somewhat agree to a point. I think Ham is a small part of a bigger company as it is for most of the other established ham radio makers. I understand Kenwood may be going out of the HF ra
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00205.html (11,518 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: "M. Todd Miskel" <foamhand@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 06:04:50 -0600
Dave, (KD2E) I can understand your point about trying to be different. Let's look at the american competition & leave the I,K,Y rigs out of it. Elecraft and Flex Radio are already showing better perf
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00226.html (8,970 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.s.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 21:14:45 -0400
Ten-Tec has to sell the products they have. The Orion is right at the top on any list of performance specs. (Giving or taking a couple of dB.) It is a much more conventional package and probably easi
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00231.html (10,978 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:29:05 +0000
Old technology? I bought my Orion in 2003. How old can the technology be? I have an old technology Collins 75A-3 with Universal Service product detector. It still works very well. I own a National HR
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00232.html (8,616 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:43:14 -0600
I'm a very satisfied Orion II owner who just recently installed the latest 'beta' firmware release. I also own a Flex 5000A, and have used a K3. The Flex 5000 is every bit as easy to use as the Orion
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00234.html (12,804 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:24:32 -0400
Can anyone spell out for me what that means? == Richards - K8JHR == "The SSB Company" indeed! == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00236.html (8,255 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: "Doug" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 03:50:34 +0000
It means no more legendary tentec CW/QSK Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Storm Can anyone spell out for me what that means? == Richards - K8JHR == "The SSB Company" indeed! == ______________
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00238.html (8,963 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.s.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 00:18:17 -0400
They are emphasizing voice quality -- for good reason. We know that TT is also the "CW company", but that doesn't sell radios so well these days. 73 Martin AA6E ______________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00239.html (9,265 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 00:25:25 -0400
Thanks... that makes sense, and matches my expectations; but I do not feel it is a particular sexy or compelling approach. It seems like they hired the same ad company that used to advise IBM which u
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00240.html (9,079 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: "M. Todd Miskel" <foamhand@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 05:55:31 -0600
Dave - K8MN, I sure hope you don't take everything in life so personally! :) Hi Hi The stress isn't healthy! Of course, I was only talking about how things work in the modern business world. I am cur
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00249.html (9,295 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu