Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+reflector\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+reflector\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre); Date: Wed Jul 16 16:23:31 2003; Gene, N0MQ, The reflector suppresses your direct email adr, so I am replying thru the reflector. Your post got to the list; not sure why you cannot post others? Here is the source of instructions for; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00483.html (6,628 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "skip" <k3cc@fast.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:59:42 -0400; As I'm new to this reflector and new to the Orion I thought that I could gleam helpful info from this reflector. I have tried to be constructive in my impressions of the Orion and my short use of sam; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00611.html (7,331 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:31:57 -0400; "At least with a software defined radio you download newer software, not purchase a new radio and lose your shirt on the old one" Now Skip I would think you would know better than this. The changes t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00612.html (9,486 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:32:27 -0400; geesh give the new guy a break Ron wb1hga _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00613.html (7,305 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:49:10 -0000; I don't think we are quiet there yet. I don't agree with many of your opinions expressed here but I certainly agree with that one. May we wait only a little longer. Bob, 5B4AGN ______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00616.html (7,072 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:11:38 +0000; Now Steve, just because you like to bash Ten Tec, give the new guy a break, he likes his radio. For me, the hardware changes mean nothing. Its the receiver that counts. You can have the PRO line and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00617.html (7,628 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:04:01 -0400; "For me, the hardware changes mean nothing. Its the receiver that counts" Now there's a good one. Let's see.....I explain how the changes to the ICOM Pro line are not software changes and am blamed f; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00618.html (10,088 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:15:00 -0500; Well, now In the early days of ham radio we learned to build 'hardware' receivers and transmitters from scratch - why not learn to program software defined radios from scratch? Then we wouldn't have; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00619.html (11,163 bytes)
9. RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:34:06 -0700; Hi Dave, "We"? When I was first licensed in 1962 (as ZS1ZG), I noted that several well-known hams of my acquaintance seemed unable to replace a blown mains fuse in their homes, let alone build a piec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00627.html (7,823 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:26:06 -0700; Here's something I sent to the Jupiter list last night, where it appears an increasingly restless bunch are waiting at the teat (I received no replies): Jupitarians: It must be abundantly clear by no; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00629.html (10,188 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:24:47 -0500; Dave, I am glad you find software easier than soldering. A bunch of us do not find software as written today anything more than a pain in the neck. And programming a Yaecomwood radio for all the repe; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00631.html (8,463 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "Chris Swallow" <chris@tallisassociates.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:39:22 +0100; Have You actually asked TenTec? I did this some years ago for my Omni and received a large packet with a printout of the current source code. (Yhis was well before the internet became so all perswasi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00638.html (8,430 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: Able2fly@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:49:01 EDT; <snip> "Mama mama, my QSK is clicking and my screen is brown" Ohhhh mama, I am loosing my audio and my output is down. Pleassssseeee mama help me before I lock up and totally shut down == LOL!!! Very; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00639.html (8,152 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:56:14 -0400; Yes, I've asked for the source code to the Pegasus and it's not being released (at least it wasn't 4 years ago, when I got the Peg). Mark received a large packet with a became so all perswasive! abou; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00640.html (8,976 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Ten Tec Reflector (score: 1): Author: "Paul T. Antos" <wb2abd@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 11:37:36 -0500; I suggest everybody read the "front page" of the TT reflector. Pay special attention to the key words "personal criticisms" and "CW vs. non-CW" http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/TenTec Pau; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00355.html (7,012 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]