Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TenTec\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+157\,\s+Issue\s+5\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 157, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: Amateur Radio WB8NUT <duffy@wb8nut.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 06:20:15 -0500
That rate is very high. If you pay your bench techs $40 an hour, then add burdened labor rate of 50% on to that, it is $60 an hour. Then add another 50% for overhead and profit, you arrive at $80. So
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00085.html (10,117 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 157, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Gates <kd3jf.paulgates@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:57:03 -0500
I will never pay $140.00 an hour for in the first place I cannot afford a $3000.00 radio. I had a lot of TenTec radios in the 70s and 80s and never paid more than $600.00 for a radio. Right now I hav
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00086.html (12,529 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 157, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:13:22 -0600
OK, I need to jump in here. I had held off posting this because of the amount of traffic on this subject, but the cost to the company is more likely much higher than that. My source? a friend of mine
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00088.html (12,923 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 157, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: Jose F Ballester <jfballester@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:14:13 -0400
Paul, there are a number of one man shops that dont have much of an overhead to speak of and could handle radio troubleshooting and repairs for less than TenTec or any other manufacturer could. 73 de
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00089.html (13,354 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 157, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 10:24:28 -0600 (CST)
True, as far as that goes. But a one man shop may not have the parts in stock, or be able to easily get them (especially those that require bulk purchases) without resorting on an online site that ch
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00092.html (15,347 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 157, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:22:16 -0800
BS. Those one-man shops simply don't know their costs. You guys are living the (distant) past. Sure, $15/hr was a decent wage -- in 1970. It sure isn't today. Try feeding yourself and your XYL on tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00094.html (8,948 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 157, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: Jose F Ballester <jfballester@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:49:47 -0400
Ron; right, thats why one man shops can charge less and companies have to charge more. Very well explained. Let's give the new TenTec owners a fighting chance. 73 de Pepe, WP3HW True, as far as that
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00096.html (16,176 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu