Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TenTec\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+212\,\s+Issue\s+1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TenTec\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+212\,\s+Issue\s+1\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ general value present day? (score: 1): Author: Malcolm McLeman <f5vbu@cegetel.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 13:22:02 +0200; Before parting with your Omni VI may I suggest you consider one thing. Omni VI not only its attributes as a receiver with unsurpassable QSK but how it sounds on air CW to others. When Japanese trans; /archives//html/TenTec/2020-08/msg00000.html (7,107 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 212, Issue 1 (score: 1): Author: N4IJ <dougn4ij@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 11:22:39 -0500; Thanks for the feedback guys. Seems like it would be wise for me to keep it.... As for the question about ringing on the CW filters - I have 500hz and 250hz in both IF's. I never noticed ringing in t; /archives//html/TenTec/2020-08/msg00001.html (21,989 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]