Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Tennessee\s+Dreamin\'\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Tennessee\s+Dreamin\'\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Richard Donovan" <n5xm@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:47:16 -0500; I was working a fellow TT owner on CW on 20m this afternoon, and our conversation led to the interesting question of "what rigs would you like to see TT bring out for their loyal users?" I would like; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00070.html (7,246 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:06:02 -0400; How many people would pay $800 for a single band, cw only radio? Forget that one. What about something like the K2/100 with no SSB adapter? N4LQ Steve _______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00071.html (8,939 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:21:45 -0400; For some reason, that reminds me... and my apologies for going slightly off topic here... One of the last products announced by the second coming of Dentron (circa 1983-4) were a bunch of single band; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00072.html (9,235 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:42:48 -0700; Sorry Steve, but I am a candidate. I will pay $800 for a monoband 40m Ten-Tec rig. Sign me up for serial number 00001. Next year I'll take one for 20m. But that's probably it. Now I don't see a need; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00073.html (9,649 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Richard Donovan" <n5xm@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:27:30 -0500; I would pay it, for a CW only single band rig with some of the Orion ideas built-in. I mean, hey, all this is for the sake of discussion anyway. That's what makes people different. I love the K2, it; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00074.html (9,903 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:20:12 -0400; Bring back the Scout? to a spend thoughts _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00075.html (9,486 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:26:03 -0500; The FCC should act by end of year or in 2005, on its proposed rule changes that will ease the amplifier rule. Then you may well see some amplifier kits for HF to take QRP radio levels to the 100 watt; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00076.html (8,124 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Richard Donovan" <n5xm@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:26:23 -0500; I've just never been a big Scout fan, Ron. I think TT can do better than that. If they want to call it a Scout II, that's fine, but they need something to compete with the mobile rigs like Yaesu and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00077.html (10,515 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:34:00 -0500; Even at 20 watts output, the Ten Tec Argonaut V does an outstanding job of competing on CW! With good conditions and the 100 watt radio at S9, you will only be just under S7 with the 20 watt Argonaut; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00078.html (8,186 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:44:54 -0000; It's even better than that. One S unit is 6db so 25 watts is one S unit less than 100 watts. So an S9 signal at 100 watts is just a frog's hair under S8 at 20 watts. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, N; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00079.html (8,565 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Richard Donovan" <n5xm@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:57:25 -0500; Carl, et al, I understand that completely, and yes, you guys are right. I guess a K2 would be the way to go. Ah, I was just thinking out loud on this stuff. Carl, I need to break down and get some of; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00080.html (10,738 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:53:32 +0000; Ten Tec did in effect make a single band cw rig. it was also a single band phone rig, and a mobile rig. It was called the Scout. Small transceiver, 50 watts, you get one and the module for the band y; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00081.html (9,563 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Walter K0TWO" <k0two@accessus.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:35:28 -0500; Here is a second to the TT 100 watt mobile rig. I have considered a Argonaut V with an add on amp for mobile, but I am over that now! So, TT, would you put the "design dream team" into action? 73...; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00082.html (8,332 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:25:07 -0400; At 06:53 PM 08/02/2004, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ wrote: Ten Tec did in effect make a single band cw rig. it was also a single band phone rig, and a mobile rig. It was called the Scout. Small transceiver, 5; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00083.html (9,545 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 23:46:14 +0000; <<<It came out at $495 (with one band module).... and it was produced for over ten years.... It was a success, I would think.....>>> Okay I'll take a correction on that. <<<>Abt 25 yrs ago, TT also m; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00084.html (9,017 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <mike_n4nt@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:47:08 -0400; Since we measure signal strength in volts and power in watts and since watts vary with the square of the voltage, are your 6dB per S-unit dB of voltage difference or of power difference? In other wor; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00085.html (9,099 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:07:38 -0400; Wasn't the Scout in the $500 price class? (I guess $800 would have included ALL of the band modules... and PS and mike and more... but I digress) Nor would I say it "flopped" as it was around for a g; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00086.html (12,304 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:14:23 -0500; You didn't mention any change in impedance so assuming an impedance of 10 Ohms, a voltage of 10 volts would then result of power of 10 watts. Now doubling the power to 20 watts, and assuming no chang; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00087.html (10,070 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:14:52 -0500; Not flopped at all Ron, The Scout had one microprocessor and was hard pressed to handle keying chores and frequency updates simultaneously. Time and design moves on. The Scout's replacement, the ARGO; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00090.html (9,431 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: "Vern Kunes" <N2YZS@mantlelamp.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:18:18 -0400; I'd also like to see a 100 watt mobile. Until then, I'll just have to make my Scout do. Vern -- Original Message -- From: "Walter K0TWO" <k0two@accessus.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00091.html (9,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]