Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+Eagle\s*$/: 110 ]

Total 110 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Rick and Karen Bunn" <RRBunn@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:29:14 -0400
Too bad the reciver specs are not up to other Ten Tec radios. .5uV???? 73 Rick N4ASX This has been an interesting thread. It got me out of the shadows. I haven't looked it up but in 1978 the triton w
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00346.html (15,419 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:51:43 -0400 (EDT)
There is something to this issue about QST reviews. As I recall, the reviewer of the Orion II said something like "I don't like the feel of this radio because I'm used to Icom and I can't operate it
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00348.html (13,476 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:07:00 -0400
MDS is -137 dBm/300Hz, preamp on. That's on-par with anything currently available. Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00350.html (10,639 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:46:01 -0500
My guess is that with legal power you won't out-transmit the receiver. If you do, it won't be often. No matter what the specs are the results are still going to depend on who is sitting in front of t
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00351.html (11,523 bytes)

105. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Gary D Krause" <n7hts@bresnan.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:46:54 -0600
I was thinking the same thing since I owned an Argonaut 5. I wish they would get away from using a plastic front panel though. It just gives it a cheap feeling, in my opinion. _______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00444.html (10,350 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:12:36 -0400
Yes, I bring my Scout when I go cabin camping, but I bring a general coverage receiver, too, a Sangean ATS-803. 73, Bob WB2VUF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenT
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00473.html (20,903 bytes)

107. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:33:31 -0500
One of the downsides of complex, new, do it all radios, is that in the heat of a contest or Field Day, or even a real emergency communication, when you are dog tired, you will forget how to do some v
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00479.html (10,790 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:56:32 -0500
The Scout did not have two extra RCA jacks nor did the Argo V. So this is not the first TT radio to not have spare jacks. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00481.html (9,903 bytes)

109. [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 13:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
The Eagle's front panel looks like the model 526 6N2 meter radio front panel with a couple of modifications. May even be in the same size box. http://www.tentec.com/index.php?id=360   Stay on course,
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00170.html (6,843 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Dave Humbertson <w3np@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 18:33:10 -0400
Yes, the front panel of the Eagle is identical in size and styling to my HF version Argonaut V model 516. The Eagle may be slightly deeper but does not have the heatsink on the rear as is the case wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00172.html (7,947 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu