- 101. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick and Karen Bunn" <RRBunn@cox.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:29:14 -0400
- Too bad the reciver specs are not up to other Ten Tec radios. .5uV???? 73 Rick N4ASX This has been an interesting thread. It got me out of the shadows. I haven't looked it up but in 1978 the triton w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00346.html (15,419 bytes)
- 102. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:51:43 -0400 (EDT)
- There is something to this issue about QST reviews. As I recall, the reviewer of the Orion II said something like "I don't like the feel of this radio because I'm used to Icom and I can't operate it
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00348.html (13,476 bytes)
- 103. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:07:00 -0400
- MDS is -137 dBm/300Hz, preamp on. That's on-par with anything currently available. Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00350.html (10,639 bytes)
- 104. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:46:01 -0500
- My guess is that with legal power you won't out-transmit the receiver. If you do, it won't be often. No matter what the specs are the results are still going to depend on who is sitting in front of t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00351.html (11,523 bytes)
- 105. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary D Krause" <n7hts@bresnan.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:46:54 -0600
- I was thinking the same thing since I owned an Argonaut 5. I wish they would get away from using a plastic front panel though. It just gives it a cheap feeling, in my opinion. _______________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00444.html (10,350 bytes)
- 106. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:12:36 -0400
- Yes, I bring my Scout when I go cabin camping, but I bring a general coverage receiver, too, a Sangean ATS-803. 73, Bob WB2VUF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenT
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00473.html (20,903 bytes)
- 107. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:33:31 -0500
- One of the downsides of complex, new, do it all radios, is that in the heat of a contest or Field Day, or even a real emergency communication, when you are dog tired, you will forget how to do some v
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00479.html (10,790 bytes)
- 108. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:56:32 -0500
- The Scout did not have two extra RCA jacks nor did the Argo V. So this is not the first TT radio to not have spare jacks. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00481.html (9,903 bytes)
- 109. [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 13:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
- The Eagle's front panel looks like the model 526 6N2 meter radio front panel with a couple of modifications. May even be in the same size box. http://www.tentec.com/index.php?id=360 Stay on course,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00170.html (6,843 bytes)
- 110. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Humbertson <w3np@atlanticbb.net>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 18:33:10 -0400
- Yes, the front panel of the Eagle is identical in size and styling to my HF version Argonaut V model 516. The Eagle may be slightly deeper but does not have the heatsink on the rear as is the case wi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00172.html (7,947 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu