Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+Eagle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+Eagle\s*$/: 110 ]

Total 110 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:57:20 -0400; OK... I can follow that. Thanks for the additional gloss. == JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00281.html (10,204 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:25:46 -0400; Probably the most significant way to sway TS-590 purchasers over to the Eagle is to include a 9 MHz I.F. port for use with LP-PAN, SDR-IQ, or QS1R as a panadapter and second Rx. For the minimal manuf; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00283.html (11,346 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:44:31 -0500; The one thing in a Corsair II (with External VFO) not available in the TT newer radios except the Orion and Orion II is DUAL RECEIVE. If you use dual RX for pile-up busting, you probably will need /; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00284.html (13,316 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:44:23 +0000; And just how many TS-590 owners are using those or even know what they are? Not half as many as some of you think I am sure. 73 KC4ATU Bill _______________________________________________ TenTec mail; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00285.html (12,035 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:21:43 -0400; If there is just one, that is one more than the Eagle will allow. I think leaving off a pan adapter output on a $1800 rig is unconscionable. I should not have to cobble one into the rig myself. I say; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00287.html (10,572 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Todd" <kh2tj@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:47:08 -0700; -- Original Message -- Well I'd say a few as there's been quite a bit of chatter over on the 590 reflector as to if the 590 will have some way of bringing out the IF for a panadapter... I say once yo; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00288.html (10,001 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:49:38 -0400; many operators want one, and how TT should be well aware of it. The inclusion of the port is a no-brainer. It takes no R&D (yes, really), nearly zero manufacturing effort, and essentially no added c; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00289.html (11,714 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Charles Strickland" <wa4oss@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:01:43 -0400; Hey, I like this post, best in two days. I have requested this long ago. I have the Jupiter, Omni VII, and Orion II. I would like to be able to connect to my RF Space SDR-IQ, use the software of my c; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00290.html (13,303 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:01:13 -0500; Paul, I couldn't disagree more, although you are right :-) For me, I don't give a hoot about a connection for a Pan adapter. I need a radio, not a tv set. I want to have a separate RX antenna input.; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00293.html (12,977 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:09:56 -0400; It's not too late for them to put those in you know! 73, Lee Paul, I couldn't disagree more, although you are right :-) For me, I don't give a hoot about a connection for a Pan adapter. I need a radi; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00294.html (13,370 bytes)
71. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:10:28 -0500; Richards I want the best darn radio I can get for the lowest possible price. I don't want to pay for options which I will NEVER use, like a Pan adapter. It doesn't interest me in the least and please; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00295.html (12,216 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:14:02 -0500; NONSENSE. I have had one in several radios which I have owned. Luckily you could switch them off. In the Orion (I), it actually ate so much processor power that it negatively impacted the performance; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00296.html (11,484 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Louis Ciotti <lciotti1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:27:18 -0400; Just my $0.02 worth.... The eagle looks nice... simple controls, simple display... etc.. Personally what I would like to see out of TenTec is a good entry level HF+6M radio. I am what is considered a; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00297.html (15,524 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:27:37 -0400; That's the single-most reason for the I.F. output. You don't pay for something you don't need as you would with an internal panadapter. The addition of the I.F. jack adds extremely little production; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00298.html (11,347 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:36:27 -0500; Maybe because it can't be built in this country for the price you are proposing... Not sure it can be built in any country for that price. When I became a ham, 48 years ago, I too began with used equ; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00300.html (16,567 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:43:00 -0400; I don't see "SPLIT" nor "REV" buttons on the Eagle's front panel. It will be interesting to see how one engages simple "DX split" without the use of rig control software. Using "A/B" is one way but t; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00303.html (10,433 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "N4PY2" <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:43:45 -0400; John Henry told me they would add a 9 mhz IF output. He said it was very easy to do. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.com _____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00304.html (12,462 bytes)
78. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:51:51 -0400; Excellent! That's a real competitive advantage over the TS-590. With the inclusion of the IF port, SDR-IQ (or LP-PAN), and N4PY control software, that's an extremely power operating combination, espe; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00305.html (13,346 bytes)
79. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Louis Ciotti <lciotti1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:12:54 -0400; I say yes this can be build... if you strip the eagle down to bare minimum, and have only a the simple controls that the older rigs, how can it not be built. Strip off the DSP, and have fixed filters; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00306.html (19,310 bytes)
80. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:02:10 -0400; NOW..THAT"S WHAT I LIKE ABOUT TT... A company that actually listens to and responds to customer needs/desires! We need a hell of a lot more of those around.....The foreign ones sure don't. I got no u; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00309.html (14,269 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]