Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+Eagle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+Eagle\s*$/: 110 ]

Total 110 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:26:56 -0400 (EDT); Good to see Ten-Tec is still introducing new products ( in the middle of a recession no less!), for some reason the front panel reminds me of the Argonaut V I once owned. Owning an Omni VII, am not l; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00310.html (10,449 bytes)
82. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:47:33 -0400; Rich -- I appreciate your position. Nevertheless, I think I represent a different market segment. Seems like everyone would create the new radio in 1) their own image, and 2) make it as simple and tr; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00311.html (20,951 bytes)
83. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:46:12 -0400; James, I'm worst than you...I want it all too! I like the older tube stuff from the 50's and 60's AND I have an Orion II. I actualy do work on and restore Drake & Collins gear as well. I enjoy both t; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00312.html (21,651 bytes)
84. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Kevin Anderson <k9iua@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:19:06 -0700 (PDT); The Eagle looks and sounds like a great rig. Too bad I can't afford one. I can't even afford a used Argo V - just can't justify that expense with the economy as it is. But on the subject of that $500; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00313.html (9,000 bytes)
85. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Burchfield, Jack" <jburchfield@tentec.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:08:14 -0400; Kevin, I agree with you on the economy! It is the pits. I really like the Scout, it was simple and very easy to use. I ran it mobile for years. That was probably the simplest and least expensive way; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00314.html (10,814 bytes)
86. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Pumbaa" <pinkertontommrs@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:26:48 -0500; Inflation hasn't helped with ham equipment. What I have a problem with is why a device like a QSK switch for a linear amplifier should sell for about four hundred dollars! Then there are those over t; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00315.html (9,182 bytes)
87. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: mike bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:52:24 -0400; This has been an interesting thread. It got me out of the shadows. I haven't looked it up but in 1978 the triton was someplace around $700 stripped with no noise blanker or cw filters, analog version; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00316.html (14,520 bytes)
88. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:13:26 -0400; Jack, Great to see you on here! Thank you for John Henry! I'm Proud OII owner. Lee, KC9CDT Kevin, I agree with you on the economy! It is the pits. I really like the Scout, it was simple and very easy; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00318.html (11,283 bytes)
89. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Pumbaa" <pinkertontommrs@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:47:32 -0500; A lot of people did not have their income increase some 285% from 1978 to today. That is the problem as companies can't sell as many ham radio sets as they do large LCD TV sets. HTs now seem very che; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00319.html (11,320 bytes)
90. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:52:49 -0400 (EDT); Yes, and the KWM-2 that I bought in 1962 for $1150 works out to $8313 today, nearly twice the price of my Orion II. It obviously has none of those modern bells and whistles, but the good news is that; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00320.html (12,695 bytes)
91. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Pumbaa" <pinkertontommrs@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:20:45 -0500; I heard a ham the other night on 40 meter SSB. He was running a Collins S-Line with the Collins amp. It was the best audio I have heard recently, it was clear as a bell. I also own an Orion II and a; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00326.html (9,104 bytes)
92. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:35:29 -0500; In 1996 or so I bought an Omni VI+. I believe it was about $2200, maybe more. I added 4 filters, maybe it was 5, and that took me to $2700 or so. 14 years later, the Eagle will come in with its filte; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00327.html (14,244 bytes)
93. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: W4ABW@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:52:16 EDT; My favorite all-time radio is the Drake TR-4. Along with their remote VFO, you could not beat it. Cost was about $399 for both units. Al W4ABW _______________________________________________ TenTec m; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00329.html (7,713 bytes)
94. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:26:59 -0400; Al, You still got/run a TR-4?? If not why?? I use Drake, Collins & TT. 73, Lee My favorite all-time radio is the Drake TR-4. Along with their remote VFO, you could not beat it. Cost was about $399 fo; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00331.html (8,517 bytes)
95. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:55:40 -0500; Part of that comes from Collins use of RF feedback to keep down intermod products. Collins spec was 3rd order 35 dB down while most solid state rigs hardly do 25 dB down 3rd order and have a lot more; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00335.html (9,103 bytes)
96. [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Bob Towers <mm0rkt@gmx.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:11:11 +0100; I'm sitting here looking at my Argonaut V... The button count and positions are the same on the Eagle and so are the knobs, except they're labelled differently. The "MULTI" knob will take care of mos; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00336.html (8,428 bytes)
97. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: W4ABW@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:37:16 EDT; To Lee. I traded the TR-4 and a few other items for the Yaesu Quadra. HI! And, the Quadra is broke as of about 6 months ago. The TR-4 never broke. Rig now is the FT-1000MP and an Alpha 89. I wish I h; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00337.html (8,196 bytes)
98. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:45:38 -0400; Al, You could easlily get them back! There's plenty around. AND yep, they still work quite well, and easliy fixed by yourself. The analog tuning is so much nicer than the digital. In short time I can; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00340.html (8,873 bytes)
99. [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:53:47 -0400; I'm astonished that the Eagle has appeared fully prepped and is only awaiting FCC certification. Most other recently-introduced rigs have had long public lead times. T-T seems ready to ship these bab; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00341.html (8,502 bytes)
100. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:19:00 +0000; There was software on the blackmarket 15 years ago that did just that. Would run the entire contest, print the log and mailing label at the end. 73 KC4ATU Bill _______________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00344.html (10,331 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]