Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+Eagle\s+and\s+the\s+legacy\s+TTs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+Eagle\s+and\s+the\s+legacy\s+TTs\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle and the legacy TTs (score: 1): Author: Joe Roberts <jroberts@io.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:42:50 -0400; Yeah, I wouldn't call the Triton a cheap rig...even though it is only $200 +/- now. It was a top of the line set in its day. I remember reading Triton ads as a kid, totally amazed at DIGITAL READOUT!; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00328.html (13,284 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle and the legacy TTs (score: 1): Author: Frank Kirschner <kirschne@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:55:02 -0400; Re: General coverage vs. ham bands-only receivers. I recently did some extensive A/B testing with a Ten Tec Omni V and a Kenwood FT-480HX. On every signal - strong, weak, or in between - the Kenwood; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00334.html (11,205 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle and the legacy TTs (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:42:51 -0400 (EDT); Joe, As an "old head" I do know what you're saying. I have an FT-102, which was my main HF radio from 1984 to 2005. (It's now "retired," on the shelf.) Its receiver was "famous" in its day, especiall; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00338.html (10,552 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle and the legacy TTs (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:15:01 -0500; Frank, Thanks for sharing that with us. Obviously you meant the TS-480 (hi). I too have owned one of these for several years, primarily as portable/mobile rig. I got a chance to compare the 480 to a; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00342.html (14,181 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle and the legacy TTs (score: 1): Author: Joe Roberts <jroberts@io.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:08:07 -0400; Well that goes to prove that some non Ten-Tec radios are good too! The Omni V can be a real noisebox. I've had two and fixed the noise issues in one with a complete recap of several boards. It will n; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00343.html (12,495 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle and the legacy TTs (score: 1): Author: "Rick and Karen Bunn" <RRBunn@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:41:04 -0400; My comparison was between the Ten Tec Corsair II, Paragon II and my Kenwood TS-450S. The Ten Tec's are better receivers and you don't need any more then a coax switch to make the comparison. I'm a EE; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00347.html (12,214 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]