Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+New\s+TenTec\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+New\s+TenTec\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] The new TenTec (score: 1): Author: Katz Ajamas <ajamas.rn@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 13:17:14 -0500; I do not know how much trouble it would be. But, I sure would like to see an addition of revision level schematics to the on line manuals. If the Eagle is going to come back with any hardware revisio; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00133.html (7,300 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] The new TenTec (score: 1): Author: Katz Ajamas <ajamas.rn@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 17:21:02 -0500; I'm going to jump in on Eagle ergonomics. I like the controls and physical layout. But, if the thing is going to get reworked physically a big heat sink would be nice. Get rid of the fans! The Alda 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00139.html (7,557 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] The new TenTec (score: 1): Author: Michael Chowning <mike.chowning@mgccc.org>; Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:50:09 -0500; I find the tuner on the Eagle difficult - one beep, two beeps, ugh. I never know if I'm turning it on, off, or tuning. The miniscule swr bar graph is useless, even if you can find it (I wear trifocal; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00146.html (8,486 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: <lstoskopf@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 14:22:40 -0400; I'm betting that Mike is regretting trying to salvage the TT line and good name. He probably didn't get much and hopefully didn't pay much for what he got. In return he inherited a bunch of headaches; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00321.html (7,043 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 14:36:23 -0500; I have the impression that sissies don't often go into the ham radio business, and if they do, don't last very long. Trying to break into a market from scratch is tough, especially when you see the r; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00322.html (9,254 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:54:55 -0400; become an overnight success." Far from overnight. Prior to the formation of Elecraft, they began with club projects for NorCal. As far as I can recall, Wayne started with the design of the Safari-4; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00324.html (7,671 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 13:33:22 -0700; Wayne and Eric have a strong resemblance to Al Kahn (K4FW) and Jack Burchfield (K4UJ), the two guys who made Ten Tec what it WAS. I strongly suspect that, while neither is getting rich, Elecraft is p; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00326.html (12,228 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 23:14:00 +0200; Paul, Partially true, but you left out the bit about blood, sweat and tears! About 3 months ago I had a long phone call with Mike. I told him what I thought the industry needed, SDR, clean transmitte; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00328.html (9,871 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:29:00 -0500; If you insist on being pedantic, at least be accurate. I alluded to Wayne's record of design of well received QRP without the details. Elecraft has a photo of Wayne and Eric shipping the first 100 K2; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00333.html (9,703 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 00:13:37 -0700; I did immediately. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00335.html (8,148 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: "Michael Poteet" <mcpoteet@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 19:16:14 -0500; I've been following this thread casually. It suddenly crossed my mind that TenTec had a line of Commercial/Government equipment (which I assumed kept the Ham Radio business in business). What happene; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00346.html (8,316 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 09:41:00 +0200; As you said, it's what's keeping Ten-Tec alive. They have been busy producing commercial receivers and that project run was supposed to run out in August. After that there was hope of ham radios agai; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00350.html (9,204 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:58:42 -0700; It's a weekend -- hopefully, he has a life. :) Jim _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00351.html (8,637 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]