Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+Next\s+Flagship\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+Next\s+Flagship\s*$/: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:02:03 +0200; I understand the desire of many of you for a new flagship radio, but in the interest of survival of the TT brand, I hope they do not do it. Kenwood, Icom, Yaesu, - ALL are daughter companies of large; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00528.html (9,315 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:44:51 +0300; Not true. Kenwood and ICOM are large communications companies. Kenwood, not to be confused with the company whose name they "borrowed" that makes kitchen appliances, is still very large in consumer e; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00529.html (7,852 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:06:21 +0000; If you're talking TS-990, IC-7800 and Flex 6700 I agree. If you're talking K3, I don't. For example, I don't see that it would be a big stretch for Ten-Tec to come out with an Eagle on steroids - mor; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00530.html (7,970 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:34:58 +0200; GM Barry, (afternoon Geoff), I was indeed speaking of the high-cost radios, not the K3. In fact I gave the K3 as an example of a company doing it right. (modular) Barry, I would ONLY agree with that; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00531.html (9,220 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:57:01 +0000; Doesn't Ten-Tec already have the mid-range handled with Eagle and Omni VII? Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00532.html (11,328 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:24:40 +0300; So how about an expansion slot which would accept either the power supply or the ATU? And then have an expansion cabinet with the same type of slot. This would give users a choice and enable to confi; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00533.html (9,135 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:53:19 +0200; I would call the Eagle an entry-level contest grade transceiver. Not sure what to call the OM7. Maybe the term "mid-range" is wrong. Let's say the mid-teens range ($1500). THAT'S the market Ten-Tec c; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00534.html (12,881 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 07:59:44 -0500; Good discussion. My only issue is I have a tendency to do more DXing and I don't consider the Eagle a tool I would choose for that job. I also press my DXing rig into contest duty which is easily don; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00536.html (14,955 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:03:32 +0200; Cecil, I guess my answer there is, the skimmer is my 2nd RX. Of course I've always worked assisted. If you work unassisted, you don't have that luxury. I found the Eagle to be the simplest to use tra; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00537.html (16,666 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:09:30 -0500; Rick it's more the way I work split frequency pile ups than a skimmer thing. Also I had hopes for a diversity receive setup for 160m...thus the RX-366.....that is now discontinued. Am glad to have my; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00538.html (18,460 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:17:03 +0200; Yes, that makes sense then, Cecil. I don't work much split in CW contests. It's pretty rare, usually not at all. And I just am not into SSB contests. The diversity receive is of course an interesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00539.html (19,527 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:57:04 -0500; Barry I agree. I don't see many hams buying radios with a price tag over $10K. And even at $5K the market by comparison is small. Most I chat with are interested in $500 to $1000 radios, and many are; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00542.html (11,455 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:36:27 -0700; Rick and all, I loaned my Eagle to a friend for an in-shack evaluation. He went to Dayton, but there's a limit to what you can do with equipment on display there. Here is his impression of the Eagle:; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00544.html (10,016 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: george fritkin via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT); I have the following OMNIVll, ORIONll, Eagle, TS590s, FT3000, K3, KX3 (with KXPA100), and the ARGO Vl. Performance is quite a bit similar across the board. It is features and ergonomics that make t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00546.html (12,830 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Mike Schatzberg <cherokeehillfarm@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:02:00 -0400; The choice was similarly made here. The tool kit on the 590 works well, and the ergonomics are superior. While the receiver is not quite as quiet as the O2, it's DSP is remarkable and does not distor; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00547.html (12,035 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Toby Pennington <w4cakk@centurylink.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:06:31 -0400; The "Double Eagle" will be out towards the end of the year, I think every one will want one. Toby K4NH The tool kit on the 590 works well, and the ergonomics are superior. While the receiver is not q; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00549.html (11,936 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:44:33 -0500; Taking mental stock of the DX group I'm a member of, there are the following represented: 2 Orion's 1 FT-5000 Several IC-7600's At least 2 IC-7800's 2 FT-1000 series 2 or 3 IC-756 Pro series 1 FT-120; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00552.html (13,438 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Jim Dunbar <knightsof@att.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:29:21 -0500; RF concepts and Ten Tec business decisions are Totally out of the control of Amateurs........ So I would not waste much time on recommendations......... k4PV Sent from my iPad _______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00560.html (12,579 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:37:27 -0400; actually in Total Control is a guy who is an Amateur, a technoid and an astute businessman And I'd venture that any good ideas are not lost. Only a ham would invest in this vast land. bill ny9h/3 So; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00561.html (12,602 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] The next flagship (score: 1): Author: k4elo@fastmail.fm; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:01:39 -0500; Well Rick, I can't agree with you that the flagship market is too small. By user serial number tally, Kenwood has now sold over 1400 TS-990s at $8,000 each. That does not count folks who have not rep; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00569.html (8,997 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]