Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Timewave\s+59\+\s+with\s+Omni\s+6\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Timewave\s+59\+\s+with\s+Omni\s+6\+\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Timewave 59+ with Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 07:07:14 EDT; Hello all, Has anyone had experience with using a Timewave 59+ with the Omni 6+ on SSB, and was it an improvement over the factory DSP? The factor DSP works ok, but I'm looking for some improvement o; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00279.html (7,126 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Timewave 59+ with Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:12:15 -0400; I've uses a Timewave 599zx with my Omni VI (opt 3). I don't know if the same applies to the 59+. The DSP has much narrower filters for CW. Also, I like being able to adjust the spot tone level on the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00281.html (8,053 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Timewave 59+ with Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 07:52:04 -0700 (PDT); "The only drawback is that my 599zx is extremely susceptible to RF. In operation without the 599zx, but with an external speaker, I have no symptoms of RF feedback, but with the 599zx, I can hear my; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00286.html (7,551 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Timewave 59+ with Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:24:51 -0500; I have a Timewave DSP 9+. It works great but not as good as the DSP in the Omni VI+. I use it on my Paragon which does not have auto null or NR functions. I suggest that you put the Tentec 1.8 KHz fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00293.html (9,023 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Timewave 59+ with Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: W9efl@aol.com; Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 23:25:13 -0400; Ground the case of the 599ZX to the ONMI VI and the problem will cease to exist. 73 W9EFL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00297.html (7,607 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Timewave 59+ with Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: W9efl@aol.com; Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 23:25:20 -0400; Ground the case of the 599ZX to the ONMI VI and the problem will cease to exist. 73 W9EFL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00298.html (7,573 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Timewave 59+ with Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: W9efl@aol.com; Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 23:25:25 -0400; Ground the case of the 599ZX to the ONMI VI and the problem will cease to exist. 73 W9EFL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00299.html (7,368 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Timewave 59+ with Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: Jim <NOSPAMjlboockh@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 07:19:44 -0500; I have used the two together. I don't do it anymore because I decided the 59+ provides no advantage over the Omni VI+'s built-in DSP. But the 59+ gets good usage with an Omni V. Sometimes I use an NI; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00401.html (8,738 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]