Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Too\s+BIG\s+to\s+FAIL\s+\!\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:03:46 +0100
That seems to be the slogan of the current times. I think the TEN-TEC brand is too big to fail. OK, wishful thinking, I know. But after some 4 months of NOTHING BUT NEGATIVITY, how about putting a li
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00032.html (7,272 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:23:42 +0000 (UTC)
Ten Tec is like some of the candidates running for President.  They would be on the undercard  Nature (and business) has a way to weed out the weak ones. George, W6GF That seems to be the slogan of t
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00035.html (8,277 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:50:19 -0500
No company is to big to fail. The problem here is that the Ten-Tec fans can not get over the fact that their beloved company had problems. Some of which were caused by pandering to the cheap nature o
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00037.html (9,663 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: Louis Ciotti <lciotti1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:49:10 -0500
I am not about to armchair QB this transition, but if it were me... 1) I would have RKR pull Ten Tec information from the website, and basically stop selling the radios. Right now if I go to the webs
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00041.html (11,161 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] <peter@frenning.dk>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:32:17 +0100
Den 05-01-2016 kl. 14:50 skrev Bill Rowlett: No company is to big to fail. The problem here is that the Ten-Tec fans can not get over the fact that their beloved company had problems. Some of which w
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00043.html (9,515 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:37:36 +0200
Actually it was worse than that. Kodak was an early adopter of digital photography. Maybe too early. The market was not ready for their products, and when it was they were unable to change mid-stream
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00046.html (8,663 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: Louis Ciotti <lciotti1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:55:52 -0500
Having owned a couple of Kodak digital cameras, I will flat out say they were junk compared to the other offering available at the time. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00053.html (9,036 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:30:42 -0600
Why is TenTec "failing" and Elecraft "thriving?" Might it have to do with the talent, ingenuity, creativity, industriousness of the operators? Starting, building and running a small business is incre
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00059.html (10,579 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: John Henry <jshenry1963@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:37:27 -0600
Jim, The answer to this question is a MULTITUDE of things, that I would rather not discuss. It would come across as talking bad about certain individuals and / or companies in a non-productive manne
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00060.html (8,886 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:29:45 -0600
Of course, my question was rhetorical, philosophical. There is no one answer, and no point in making a list of possibilities. My point was to illustrate that these successes very often reflect the un
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00064.html (10,227 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: Amos Joseph Favorite Jr <w5sjl@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:44:27 -0600
I am holding out for the next HFRig, I have had several holding on the Orion 2. They RX Very well, Tx audio Broadcast Quality on SSB. I am 68, they need to hurry-up. Amos 2 Sent from my iPad ________
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00076.html (10,044 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Too BIG to FAIL ! (score: 1)
Author: Gary J FollettDukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:18:47 -0600
Complete service manual with detailed and very readable schematics for the Orion and Orion 2 are still on lone at RKR. Many schematics of older radios are still there too. Why waste paper printing th
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00079.html (13,966 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu