Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Top\s+receivers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Top\s+receivers\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: "Kris Merschrod" <Kris@merschrod.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:25:54 -0400; Hands off my old mitters! No phasing out, they are already out of phase. I promise not to use the spark gap during sports events :>) Kris KM2KM _______________________________________________ TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00103.html (15,649 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:39:57 -0500; Just for curiosity, how do the older (analog signal generation) Ten-Tecs (Triton/540/544, Omni-A/B/C/D, Corsairs etc.) compare on the transmit side in this regard? Is this a solid state/broadband PA; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00105.html (13,082 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 18:12:16 +0200; BOTH Actually the older analog Ten-Tecs were about as good as 12v bipolar rigs get. It is some of the newer rigs that are a disaster and as I recall, NONE of the disasters are Ten-Tec rigs. So, it do; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00108.html (14,188 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:48:22 -0700; I strongly agree, Rick, and that includes power amplifiers. But even the cleanest rig and amp can generate trash if the amp is over-driven, if the amp is mis-tuned, if AGC is used between the amp and; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00113.html (9,758 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 13:51:51 -0500 (CDT); Somehow, someway, we need to educate operators in how to operate a station cleanly. I agree with another post that we are seeing and experiencing some really bad signals on the band and to a large ex; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00115.html (11,180 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:11:09 -0400; I THINK I LIKE THE IDEA OF MARKET PRESSURE BETTER than asking for more legislation. Once you get it mandated, it is murder getting around it later when a better technology comes along. I think all th; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00117.html (9,744 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:27:20 -0400; Amen, JB. ___________________________________________ Good Operating Practices Dept. Memo No. 29887 ___________________________________________ Unfortunately, there are very few good resources with i; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00118.html (11,128 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 21:37:11 +0200; Bob, no disagreement on that, but I honestly think people here don't realize that there are some rigs on the market today that nobody can generate a clean signal with. We can't just blame it on the o; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00119.html (12,387 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:41:22 -0400; As an aside, "RTFM" still is a VERY GOOD idea. Seriously, I have learned as much by listening to how others are doing things or looking over the shoulder of an operator who is getting it done, but we; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00120.html (12,055 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: k3miy@csonline.net; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:35:10 -0400; Hi Back when I was a No Vice, the ARRL had a neat little pamphlet that showed everything from basic procedure to traffic handling. Wonder if they still publish it? Ron K3MIY -- This mail sent through; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00123.html (13,574 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:21:20 -0700; When you and I were first licensed, there were probably one or more hams within walking distance of our houses. My mentor ( Harry, WA8PVA (SK) ) was halfway down the block on the other side of the st; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00125.html (10,295 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 18:56:32 -0400 (EDT); FCC and the radio companys and ARRL caused this...all due to wanting more income. I'll leave it at that. We should do better self policing...cause maybe someday, as they LET it get worse & worse...th; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00126.html (10,834 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:08:32 -0500; I agree with you Jim, I certainly want my signal to be the best it can be with the equipment I have. And if some part of the problem is op error then I want to fix it. That's why my sudden concern ab; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00127.html (9,536 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Paul Gates <kd3jf@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 22:37:04 -0400; AMEN to your comments. I have the TenTec580 which is the Delta. I like it and do not have a problem with noise in my very noisey neighborhood. I am in my 82nd year and will if I could take it to my g; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00129.html (16,375 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:55:29 -1000; There is no situation so bad that it cannot be made worse with government help. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00131.html (8,712 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 01:36:40 -0400; _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00134.html (8,948 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 01:45:27 -0400; Speaking of taking things to the grave... this is a true story: A rich guy was dying and he summoned his three most trusted advisers, his lawyer, his doctor, and his Pastor. He gave them each $50,000; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00135.html (10,846 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 21:28:40 -0400; More cash for clunkers? No, no, no, FCC keep your hands off my Heathkit HW-100, DX-60A, Corsair, and those historic boat anchors! And EPA, stay away from my classic 1992 Ford Explorer SUV! Let freedo; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00158.html (16,714 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 21:05:37 -0500; I agree that I do not want FCC or Government intervention. However, today the FCC mandates that the transmitter must meet certain spectral purity. The manufactures are required to meet those guidelin; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00159.html (19,381 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 01:37:50 -0400; Am I the only one to think the audio output kinda sucks ? I am NOT one of those Hi Fi audio guys, but I mean, really... these radios are often rated at 10% Total Harmonic Distortion (THD.) . Sheesh..; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00160.html (9,752 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]