Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Trading\s+Radio\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Trading\s+Radio\'s\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Tom Pennebaker <n4rs@iamotelephone.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 08:13:37 -0500; Any pros and cons on trading my Omni 7 for an Eagle? The 7 is sitting doing nothing but collecting dust.....Some of you have both so I value your opinions...Tom N4RS _________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00773.html (7,239 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 08:29:31 -0500; What's wrong with having an Omni VII? 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tent; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00774.html (7,874 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Tom Pennebaker <n4rs@iamotelephone.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 08:50:30 -0500; 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen Any pros and cons on trading my Omni 7 for an Eagle? The 7 is sitting doing nothing but collecting dust.....Some of you have both so I value your opinions...Tom N4RS ___________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00775.html (8,093 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: george fritkin via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 06:56:39 -0700 (PDT); Though choice I have both. Two different radios George, W6GF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00776.html (9,418 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 09:12:54 -0500; Ahaaa! I know that feeling. After 55 years of this, I agree..... these knobless radios are a new trick for us old dogs. Let me make a suggestion.... never buy a 706MKIIG, it's a button masher's parad; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00777.html (10,054 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 09:36:36 -0500; Totally two different radios in most all aspects. I have both. I would not trade one for the other. In other words, the Eagle won't do what the Omni VII does nor will the Omni VII do what the Eagle d; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00778.html (9,317 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 10:12:30 -0500; Ha, having been a ham for 55+ years and finally reached the ripe age of maturity at 72, I find there is one new model that boasts 23 knobs and 135 buttons on the front panel and most of them have dua; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00781.html (11,715 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Mike Stricker via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 11:08:18 -0700 (PDT); Hi Tom, I had an Orion 2, now I have the Eagle. If you don't like menus, steer clear of the Eagle. Although it is an excellent radio, there are many, non-intuitive, button presses that are sometime; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00782.html (8,130 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: denton sprague <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 11:59:29 -0700; I have both.thinking of trading the Eagle for a second Omni 7. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00784.html (8,369 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Tom Pennebaker <n4rs@iamotelephone.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 15:18:08 -0500; What don't you like about the Eagle? Any pros and cons on trading my Omni 7 for an Eagle? The 7 is sitting doing nothing but collecting dust.....Some of you have both so I value your opinions...Tom N; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00785.html (9,272 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 17:53:33 -0400; Bob, When you were at Dayton, I believe you were the one that mentioned that your physical inspection of the Omni VII indicated a potential "pin 1" problem. This sort of agrees with my asking TT tech; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00787.html (9,042 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Robert <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 17:44:16 -0500; First I was not in Dayton. Second, the pin 1 problem doesn't exist. For starters, as to RFI issues, yes antenna to radio spacing, increasing same, will usually improve the issue. Be sure all equipmen; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00788.html (10,053 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 16:08:59 -0700; I was the guy who looked at the radios and identified what are very likely Pin One Problems in every one of them. The definition of a Pin One Problem is a connector whose shield contact (for example,; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00789.html (11,716 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 19:53:54 -0400; 1) My apologies to you and Bob for the mix up. 2) Thanks for the interesting test outlined below. 3) The question begs to be asked: How come the older solid state radios (like my TR-7) did not exhibi; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00790.html (12,091 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 19:20:47 -0500; My take, having both radios and then some, each radio has a specific form, fit and function. They aren't the same and shouldn't be expected to function the same. Some hams seem to have the need to ch; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00792.html (10,572 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 19:59:24 -0500; Older radios did not offer the high speed inputs and outputs being used for data. These high speed circuits work in the RF range if one considers the data rates where analog circuits had limited freq; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00794.html (13,753 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 18:01:26 -0700; Study the extensive material on my website about The Pin One Problem. http://k9yc.com/publish.htm Every wire CAN be an antenna. and the Pin One Problem connects it to the inside of the box, where it; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00795.html (9,668 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 18:05:59 -0700; That has NOTHING to do with it. Study the material on my website about the Pin One Problem. It was first discovered in audio equipment, both pro and consumer. It has NOTHING to do with bandwidth -- i; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00796.html (9,556 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 09:05:41 +0200; Yeh, seems all the OEM's misunderstood us. We spoke of wireless knobs; they gave us knobless wires. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) Ahaaa! I know that feeling. After 55 years of this, I agre; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00001.html (10,103 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: art N4UC <n4uc@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 21:54:34 -0500; Well said Bob. Before I got my Orion I borrowed an O7 for a few days and was pleasantly surprised that I had no problem setting up and operating that radio first time sight unseen. That seems to mean; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00023.html (12,472 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]