Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Twinlead\s+and\s+Balanced\s+Tuners\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:37:07 -0700
I strongly urge anyone using or considering balanced feedline and and/or a balanced tuner to study the part of my RFI tutorial that talks about antennas and balance. Almost any ham antenna is likely
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00129.html (10,365 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:01:28 -0500
Agree 100%. I use a 160 meter dipole center fed with 600 ohm line and a balun where it enters the house. From the balun it goes to a 238 tuner. I've tried several types of balun and finally settled o
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00133.html (12,032 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:55:12 -0500
I fully agree with Jim on these points. Resonant antennas for each band/frequency are the way to go. An the coaxial choke balun properly constructed and installed very close to the feedpoint is and e
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00135.html (12,884 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:49:15 -0700
You don't agree at all -- what you've described is precisely what I'm recommending that you NOT do. :) 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesti
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00139.html (9,626 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:45:07 EDT
Hi all, While not disagreeing with any of the technical points Jim makes, I simply want to mention that I had a twinlead-fed 80-meter dipole at my old New Jersey QTH. It was supported at each end by
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00140.html (8,311 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: VE1BN <ve1bn@eastlink.ca>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:54:24 -0300
Jim - Thanks for the very compressive "A Ham's Guide to RFI, Baluns, and Audio Interfacing, Rev 2." I have been using 31 material snap-ons for a while to block RF on my 9913 coax at the feedpoint of
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00142.html (10,388 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <va7to@yahoo.ca>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:33:42 -0700
For most hams the antennas they deploy are constranded by budget, minimizing complaints from neighbors and XYL, and the physical space they have to work with. Multiband antennas commonly fit into thi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00144.html (9,326 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
--"Resonant antennas for each band/frequency is the way to go. An the coaxial choke balun properly constructed and installed very close to the feed point is and excellent performer. It handles lots o
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00145.html (8,273 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:25:44 -1000
Darrell makes some real good points regarding efficiency. Many "wideband" or "multiband" antennas claim low SWR over wide frequency ranges or multiple bands, and in fact they often live up to that cl
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00146.html (9,988 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:37:06 -1000
Oops. I should have said "too good to be true" _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00147.html (7,902 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:53:07 -0600
The double bazooka is a sham. It can have a slightly increased bandwidth, but that's from the fatter ends made of shorted twinlead, not the connections at the center. And its made mostly of insulatio
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00149.html (11,268 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu