Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Users\s+experience\s+with\s+Hallicrafters\.\s+SX\-28\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Users\s+experience\s+with\s+Hallicrafters\.\s+SX\-28\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Users experience with Hallicrafters. SX-28 (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Thu Jan 23 13:52:08 2003; Well, the hallicrafters (small h) I can tell you about. Mid to late 1930's technology, quite nice for the time. Heavy, of course. The main dial was usually within 20 to 50 kc (kHz) and it had what wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00537.html (7,426 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Users experience with Hallicrafters. SX-28 (score: 1): Author: tjednacz@ieee.org (Thomas Jednacz); Date: Thu Jan 23 14:58:57 2003; I had one of these back in the early '60's. Considering what I had before it was great! It was the first to use a noise cancelling circuit. It took the signal from the antenna and shifted the phase 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00539.html (8,397 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]