Condition: VFO A is on 30 meters LCW mode VFO B is on 60 meters USB mode. Result: VFO B receives on frequency but transmits 500Hz low of frequency displayed. If VFO A is then changed to USB mode (and
Hi Randy, Could you describe more of your setup? What was your VFO assignments? (Default is TX = VFO A, RX = VFO A and SUBRX = VFO B. How were you measuring your TX frequency? 73, Lin WB1AIW Randy K4
This IS a problem - consider this scenario (this is how it happened to me...) I was listening to 30 meter CW (Main Rcvr) and also listening to a 60 meter channel (USB) on the Subrcvr. A station I wan
Hi Randy, I notice here that when you changed TX from VFO A to B, you assumed the TX mode would become the same as the SUB RX mode because it was assigned to VFO B too. My first thought is of course
Believe it or not, the "565 Manual" does not even attempt to define how is the the TX mode established! Therefore it cannot be a software bug, because there is no specification. It's only specified t
Well, I see what you are saying, but the offset is the problem. And. intuitively I will assume that the TX follows the mode set on the VFO. Anything else is just plain weird. 73, Randy K4QO _________
Sinisa, =:-) What a sense of humor. But at least you agree, it meets the specification! Ron KA7U Believe it or not, the "565 Manual" does not even attempt to define how is the the TX mode established
I have to admit, I gotta chuckle from that... Thanks _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
The nature of bugs since the advent of software, free features you didn't have to pay for:) for. My Orion sure makes me happy. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenT
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:08:24 -0500
That's what we always called them - undocumented features! Dave K5WNV The nature of bugs since the advent of software, free features you didn't have to pay for:) for. My Orion sure makes me happy. __
I've been thinking about this discussion. At first I thought it was funny, but after consideration I think a review of the ORION Sub receiver function might be the right direction for this conversati
Given the way the radio is designed I would expect that the Main RX would always be used to control the transmissions and the Sub would be used for listening only. No, no, no I use the Sub as the TX
The main is a better reciever and I use it for just that. I transmit on my sub all the time whenever split mode is called for. 73, John NA9U _______________________________________________ TenTec ma
N6AHA: Given the way the radio is designed I would expect that the Main RX would always be used to control the transmissions and the Sub would be used for listening only. K4IA: No, no, no I use the S
Buck, I have used the same method you state here, but I always have the Main RX mode set the same as the Sub RX mode when doing this. On My ORION II, I've not been able to replicate the problem of tr