Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+What\'s\s+going\s+to\s+be\s+next\?\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:11:49 -0500
The Orion was a magnificent radio & it made it through two really nice versions but for whatever reasons, an Omni 3 was not offered & the Omni 2 was the end of life of that lineage. The current top o
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00169.html (7,496 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@frontier.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:59:26 -0600
Me, I'm hoping for a Corsair III. 73, Steve WA9JML On 1/19/2014 10:11 PM, Gary Smith wrote: The Orion was a magnificent radio & it made it through two really nice versions but for whatever reasons, a
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00171.html (8,337 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:06:25 +0100
Every now and again the topic of future (dream) radio comes up. In my opinion, expensive radios are not the bread and butter of any company and in light of the life cycle of components these days, no
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00172.html (9,662 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:00:08 -0500
Sigh, I didn't write it properly. What I meant to say was... The Orion was a magnificent radio & it made it through two really nice versions but for whatever reasons, an Orion 3 was not offered & the
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00174.html (8,459 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:28:43 -0600
Having or having been through the "lot", today the Omni VII is the radio with the features and good performance. Likely there are still enhancements in the pipe for the Omni VII. I view this as very
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00178.html (10,679 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:52:30 -0600
Why bother with an S meter? In every contest that I've worked every one receives and gives a 599 report followed by "uh, could you give your call phonetically as I did't get it". Geez, I thought one
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00179.html (11,531 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:55:09 -0600 (CST)
SOME of us give out more-or-less honest signal reports. Even in contests. <g> Why bother with an S meter? In every contest that I've worked every one receives and gives a 599 report followed by "uh,
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00180.html (11,894 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:13:48 +0100
For conducting A/B antenna tests. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) Why bother with an S meter? In every contest that I've worked every one receives and gives a 599 report followed by "uh, cou
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00181.html (12,802 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:33:29 -0500
A slightly larger Eagle II with the added functions you would find in the Omni VII, in a price range of $2500-2700 would be a show stopper. That means it would need room for a 2nd RX-366 that is opti
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00182.html (13,025 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:46:44 -0800
A/B antenna tests, and F/B ratios on beams if you have a stable local signal. I would also add in the "next" category, remote capability like the K3-K3/0 where you have 'dummy' radio or control head
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00184.html (14,388 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:54:40 -0800
And a BIG heatsink so a fan is not required, but optional.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00185.html (11,679 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: John King <k5pgw@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:12:05 -0800 (PST)
I often wonder if the license that I have held for 56 years still exists among the  numerous ego nurses around today. My Omni VI, which I have owned for 20 years and bought used from Ten Tec used sal
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00186.html (16,552 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:20:21 +0000
Dang John....a Motor Coach...I figured you as more of a Pop Up guy...I mean it does everything one would want of a camping device. Hey just a little humor... Cecil K5DL From: John King Sent: January
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00187.html (16,845 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:47:47 +0000
Well I hope they stick with the dual VFO knobs. It may seem silly but that is one of the big reasons I went to an Orion II. I came from Yaesu FT-1000 series radios and two things I really enjoy havin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00188.html (12,732 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:32:11 -0700
Cecil, BRAVO! I agree with your notes on the next Orion or whatever it will be named. 2 knobs are a must. no scope in the radio, but a video output that would need only an external monitor to scope t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00189.html (15,264 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: John King <k5pgw@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:57:50 -0800 (PST)
No Cecil, think about it ! The family who owns a Escalade SUV or a Cadillac, usually lives in a shotgun house leaning so bad, it needs a pine pole at an angle to prop it up and has a stove pipe stick
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00191.html (18,897 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:59:31 +0000
Forget it - it needs to have a mahvelous sounding AM transmitter. The Orion and Eagle actually sound amazing on AM. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00192.html (9,570 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:12:47 -0700
ok Barry, add PSK31 with AM then HI. jack NO AM mode. Forget it - it needs to have a mahvelous sounding AM transmitter. The Orion and Eagle actually sound amazing on AM. 73, Barry N1EU ______________
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00194.html (10,306 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: Charles <cnagel@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:05:12 -0600
Not silly. That capability in conjunction with a band scope permits easily setting your rig on a clear spot when calling a DX station 1 or more kHz above his frequency. Then don't forget to press the
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00196.html (15,519 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:48:33 -0600
It also helps to notice that split is still invoked, when QSYing from the CW portion of the band to the phone portion of the band. Steve WA9JML 73, Charles K0cw Sent from my iPhone On Jan 20, 2014, a
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00197.html (14,817 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu