Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+What\s+Radio\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+What\s+Radio\?\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:12:03 -0500; Hello, The quandry of what radio is faced by us all. I rely on Sherwood Engineering reports to grade the receivers, and the Yaecomwoods invariable pale compared to Elecraft K3, K2, and Ten Tec offeri; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00189.html (7,435 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: "Frank Kirschner" <KF6E@mail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:28:09 -0400; Hello, The quandry of what radio is faced by us all. I rely on Sherwood Engineering reports to grade the receivers, and the Yaecomwoods invariable pale compared to Elecraft K3, K2, and Ten Tec offeri; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00190.html (8,532 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:53:46 -0400; I've mostly considered the 200-watt feature as a Madison Avenue marketing gimmick. This appeals to folks who only live in a linear world (i.e., if one is good, two is twice as good). We could make t; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00191.html (8,386 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:31:05 +0200; The comparison of the Eagle to the 590 is very realistic. The 590 is the best value for the money on the market. The Eagle costs a little more, but it's worth it to me and many of us. Comparing it to; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00192.html (10,435 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:29:22 -0400; Stuart - Forgive me for venting on this subject, but Rob Sherwood's chart is perhaps the most misunderstood piece of information in ham radio today. It is not, and was never intended to be, a grading; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00193.html (11,902 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:32:54 -0500; There's not a lot of difference between the top 10 radios listed in Rob Sherwood's chart..... and for 90 to 95% of the operators reading the charts, the differences between ANY two radios from the to; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00194.html (13,313 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:20:58 -0700; I admit to missing the initial post in this thread, but the obvious question is, what do you want to DO with your radio, and what special challenges do you face at your QTH, or with your style of ope; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00195.html (10,860 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:50:18 -0500; I agree with Jim regarding the radio environment you and your radio equipment operate in. Still those radios with 80db or better dynamic range at 2KHz are competitive when the operator understands th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00197.html (12,369 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:58:00 -0400 (EDT); Hi all, I agree with Gary: the operator makes a big difference. Our brains are all wired differently, but as a rather experienced weak-signal CW op I have difficulty with the notion that, at normal s; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00198.html (14,475 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:16:37 -0700 (PDT); You know thats a good question. Just because I am on the Ten Tec forum and I have a TenTec radio does not mean my next radio will be a Ten Tec. Seams we are in another transition stage with radios an; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00199.html (8,354 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:09:19 -0700; That's NOT the function of a spectrum display. Some of the ways I use my P3 include: 1) Helping me figure out where the DX station is listening in a pileup 2) Helping me find a clear spot in a busy b; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00200.html (9,689 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:57:19 -0400 (EDT); Jim, Yes, a scope can monitor a range of frequencies at the same time. The ear can't. Actually, I use the Orion II sweep display (v2.044a, set to 36 kHz) to do functions 1-3. It won't identify the st; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00203.html (10,647 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:05:06 +0200; Jim, your strategy works for you, and that's fine. But it doesn't work for me. Maybe I'm weird but I still have the same mic, keyer, headphones, matchboxes, etc., that I had 35 years ago. I estimate; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00208.html (10,459 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:37:34 -0400; K8AC: Orion II probably hasn't tried an Orion II. I was an original Orion owner for 4 years and much prefer the K3 for the following reasons: 1. The K3's sub-RX is identical to its Main and close-spa; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00211.html (10,242 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:17:18 -0400 (EDT); Although Bill was writing about the original Orion, he has pretty well summed up the wish list for an Orion III (or Orion II MkII): 1. Sub RX identical to the main RX 2. First IF output with no user; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00212.html (10,935 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: "Steve Sloane" <ssloane1@rcn.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:18:19 -0400; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00213.html (11,782 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 04:13:48 -0700 (PDT); See http://www.remeeus.eu/hamradio/pa1hr/productreview.htm :( Stay on course, fight a good fight, and keep the faith. Jim K9TF/WA9YSD _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00000.html (6,312 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: "Frank Kirschner" <KF6E@mail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:35:20 -0400; The notion that there is no difference between 100 watts and 200 watts is flawed. There is a little over 3dB difference, which often makes the difference between a QSO, albeit a rough one, and no QSO; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00156.html (8,556 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:51:15 -0600; I agree totally. I have 100 W and know that any boost would have helped in several cases over the years. I have missed considerable DX because I could not increase the power. there are many stations; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00161.html (9,398 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:41:06 -0400; Serious question -- So... where does it stop ? If 200 watts makes a 100 watt rig just a bit better, why would a 300 watt amp not make that 200 watt rig just a bit better and find you even more DX ? A; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00169.html (8,696 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]