Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Yep\s+\-\-\s+Omni\s+VII\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Yep\s+\-\-\s+Omni\s+VII\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:10:40 -0400; Unless the receiver is as good or better than Orion, it won't blow my frock up too much. Sure was hopeing for something with 2 separate rcvrs with Orion performance specs. You guys can have all the b; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00146.html (9,150 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:17:56 -0400; And theUK price of an Icom 7800 is ??? WA4TT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00148.html (8,518 bytes)
23. [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:56:53 -0700 (PDT); Interesting it only missed Dayton by 8 weeks? Critical will be if the main receiver is ham bands only (which I would consider a plus). Now that the announcement of the Omni 7 has been made, I wonder; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00150.html (7,032 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 02:16:41 +0000; Me too - someone give a shout and wake me up when a new TT rig with 2 fb rx is released. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00151.html (9,021 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Craig Roberts <crgrbrts@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 22:28:42 -0400; Okay -- so it's $13,500.00 -- but that's for a PACKAGE deal...with a microphone, even! :-) Point taken. 73, Craig W3CRR _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00152.html (8,528 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "HUGHESRO" <ROGERH@realtracs.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:39:30 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00153.html (9,616 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:54:34 EDT; Well folks, this may actually be the start of a new revolution in ham radio. according to the info on site you can literally plug this into a router at you cabin on the peak of the mountain at 7000 f; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00155.html (8,674 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:55:39 -0400; And I want to be the first to go or record and tell ya'll that it works flawless for me and I've never had any problems. So ya'll either don't have the right kind of antenna, or you don't know how to; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00156.html (10,977 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:45:37 -0500; So, ok...why not 6 in Orion II???? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm? Inquiring minds need to know. Larry, N0XB Absolutely Grant. And if we're lucky it may even change the tone of discussion (as well a; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00157.html (11,144 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:13:46 EDT; a how about CPM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00158.html (8,074 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 23:16:23 -0500; ""HF + 6: Transmit coverage on 6 through 160 meters, 100 watts output, even on 6. General coverage receive from 500 kHz to 30 MHz continuous plus 50 to 54 MHz. "" GENERAL COVERAGE RCVR ..... LIKE A J; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00193.html (8,712 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Caitlyn Martin <caitlyn@mizuhoradio.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:55:13 -0500; SNOBOL is (was?) a programming language. CP/M is (was?) an operating system, pretty much a precursor to DOS. Software written in any number of languages could run on a CP/M based system. It's apples; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00194.html (9,095 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 01:56:32 +0000; Yes, and like the Orion subrx, with a 455khz i.f. for those Collins mech filters 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00200.html (7,656 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:44:28 -0700; The requirement to have general-coverage on receive has always puzzled me. Back in the day when I got into ham radio, the best radios were optimized to work on the amateur bands. Yes, I know that not; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00208.html (8,295 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:51:22 -0700; SNOBOL (SNOBOL4, SPITBOL) and other variants were interesting ideas. SNOBOL was never a commercial success, but was used a good bit in university/library research, and found some applications in, sh; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00210.html (11,661 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:02:28 -0700; General coverage receive and transmit is essential to services other than the Amateur Radio Service. MARS, for example. MARS, contrary to common mythology, is NOT dead. Some MARS frequencies are clo; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00211.html (8,519 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:32:28 -1000; I like to cruise the HF spectrum in between the ham bands occasionally, and that is the mail reason I have a Paragon II. I prefer to use the Omni VI for the ham bands. As for the Omni VII, I'll be wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00213.html (8,163 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 10:15:37 +0000; Aren't upconverted GC receivers just cheaper to make and that would explain their popularity? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00214.html (8,293 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Ira Franklin <k4ymq@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 04:47:19 -0700 (PDT); It's great to have 6 meters on new Omni 7, how ever it only covers 50 to 54 mhz. The 48, 49 and 55 Mhz range is used by 6 meter operators as a propagation indicator since those frequency ranges are u; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00217.html (9,565 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:56:25 -0400; Hi Where are those Collins filters in the RX chain? is the main RX DSP? Tired minds wnat to know. Ron K3MIY Yes, and like the Orion subrx, with a 455khz i.f. for those Collins mech filters 73, Barry; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00218.html (8,906 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]