Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+audio\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:48:18 -0700
under AUDIO i set the SPKR to MAIN only and eliminated SUB RX audio in the Orion's speaker but it still comes thru the audio card in my computer jack _______________________________________________ T
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00128.html (6,311 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:51:39 -0700
the Orion is built to work directly with the sound card in one's computer ...in my IC756 i have isolation transformers ... i just removed the sound card and replaced it with a new sound card ...now i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00168.html (8,977 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:13:37 -0500
Jack, When I had an Orion back in August, I noticed that the audio setup to the back ACCY jack was inconsistent. While you can control which audio goes to the speaker and to the right and/or left hea
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00178.html (8,794 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:48:55 EST
Mark, did you send your Orion back? Why. Thanks, Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00179.html (6,699 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:07:26 -0600
One would expect that, as a software-defined radio, the functions of the ORION ACCY pins would be determined by the control program. In that way, given the proper menu provisions, the operator could
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00180.html (10,373 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:31:36 -0500
George, Yes, that's what I expected, and especially since the radio gives you overkill in being able to route the audio to the headphones and speaker. For example, for SSTV operation, it would be nic
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00181.html (8,024 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:00:52 -0600
Maybe. But I'm not sure total user definition of everything is a reasonable expectation at all. Interfacing in particular, is an area that it seems to me should be standardized. I can't even begin t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00182.html (8,848 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:16:33 -0600
Grant, as usual, we largely agree on this. My notion is that the ORION should not be promoted as a software-defined radio with all that implies without providing some indication of its software-defin
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00183.html (13,393 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:17:20 -0600
I generally agree that no product should be misrepresented in the way you suggest. But I still see the gap with reality not as expectation based on promotion hype, but expectation based on wishful t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00187.html (12,593 bytes)

10. RE: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 16:30:22 -0500
With respect to the FlexRadio SDR-1000, there is another difference: users have access to the source code. 73, Dave, AA6YQ I generally agree that no product should be misrepresented in the way you su
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00188.html (13,113 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 19:59:13 -0700
you are right! jack to over wanting ACCY the _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00196.html (10,482 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 22:05:29 -0000
Very well put. I was hoping I could use the SO-239 as the mic connector - that would be a solid connection (vbg). based and it extreme :-) 10X description of in ______________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00229.html (14,675 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 02:01:55 -0000
Is all of the source code available ? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00230.html (15,920 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 04:01:27 -0000
AH! Might help people if you posted the functions dedicated to each of those 6 processors. the raises the to were. specified required. four a back you as get more many we'd us the ___________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00231.html (15,587 bytes)

15. RE: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 19:00:43 -0500
Yes. Didn't you already ask me this? 73, Dave, AA6YQ Is all of the source code available ? -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Bernstein" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Friday
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00233.html (16,490 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 23:15:24 -0500
Steve, I believe so. You have to purchase the SDR-1000 hardware to get access to it, but it can be downloaded from the website. Mark _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing lis
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00246.html (8,447 bytes)

17. [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:06:20 -0500
One has to keep in mine that the new ham's are looking for great audio they don't look at receiver specifications. all the new ham's in my area are buying transceivers with eq built in. _____________
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00123.html (6,607 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:36:20 -0600
Are you suggesting we should let them be in their ignorance, rather than try to educate them? I think it's our obligation to teach them about receiver specs too and then let each one decide for thems
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00128.html (7,649 bytes)

19. [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:31:54 -0400
I have for sale a w2ihy 8b EQ and Marshall mxl990 mike with shock mount and power supply for the mike 990. I am selling all for 260 shipped _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00608.html (6,812 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu