Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+band\s+stacking\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+band\s+stacking\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 18:35:03 -0000; My N4PY Orion Control Program solves this band stacking problem. It has separate band buttons for CW and SSB and a third set that can be defined for SWL or PSK use. See my webapge at www.n4py.com Car; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00176.html (10,604 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 14:37:27 -0400; Carl...I have not been able to access your website all morning. Perhaps I am doing something wrong. Also, the one at http://www.ralabs.com/n4py for 20 the is _________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00178.html (11,644 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 02:46:03 -0000; Carl. Your server finally came up and I read the info. I couldn't understand if your program is something that runs strictly on the PC or if it actually replaces the firmware in the rig. I'm waiting; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00190.html (12,352 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 02:52:11 -0000; Steve, My software runs in the PC and talks to the Orion just like the pegasus program does. And my program has a sweep that runs on the sub-receiver. It is not as fast as the Orion sweep but it is n; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00191.html (13,737 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "A. Sewell" <n5na@att.net>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 21:56:52 -0500; Steve, I don't think it's typical for the rig to lock up while running the sweep. I always run my sweep and rarely have any problems with the rig locking up. It has locked up before but it's been a l; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00192.html (8,700 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 03:30:45 -0000; Are you running cw using the internal keyer as I am Alan? I'm constantly having some function either quit working or change on me. For example, the tuning step menu just went nuts. and it was showing; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00195.html (9,894 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 23:43:26 -0400; Steve, That x10 is a 'feature' on the Orion. :>))) If you have the Step set to 10, push the MAIN RX button and it switches the step to 100 and the display changes to x10. Push the MAIN RX button agai; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00198.html (11,002 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 23:50:28 -0400; Alan, Unfortunately it is 'typical' for the Orion to do that. It is something that Ten Tec has been trying to solve in firmware since before last September. It is also one of the items listed for fir; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00199.html (10,052 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 03:54:20 -0000; Wow thanks Tom. I must have missed that one somehow. This will help me qsy a little faster. Steve N4LQ 10, to finally locking of that? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00200.html (12,092 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "A. Sewell" <n5na@att.net>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 22:55:23 -0500; Yes, I use the internal keyer. I just rarely have any problems. I think there has already been a post on your "x10m" question. That is a feature. By pressing the Main RX button it changes the step fr; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00201.html (11,101 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 08:17:07 -0500; Personally, I don't find a band scope very useful because I'm usually looking for a signal right at the noise level (or below.) So, I leave mine off. I've had my Orion for about 4 weeks, and have onl; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00209.html (10,231 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 13:43:19 -0000; Well Duane I guess we are the opposite. I don't care for weak dx signals so I hunt for strong stateside signals with the scope in hopes of a good rag chew. So I need that scope to work! I've been lea; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00210.html (12,301 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 09:14:49 -0500; The scope routines have been the culprit in several issues. It appears that this is being addressed in the coming 1.370 release. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00216.html (7,581 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 14:24:25 -0000; Now wouldn't it seem like good business to tell the customer about these problems when they order one? Oh....wait...I forgot...Maybe no one would order one then..Sorry. Steve N4LQ ___________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00218.html (8,317 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 09:34:03 -0500; A read of the T-T archive will give any prospective buyer more info than is easily absorbed on many aspects of this radio ... including operating techniques and settings .. that are not in the manual; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00220.html (9,432 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 14:47:57 -0000; I agree but when it comes to something as drastic as the rig locking up when the scope is turned on might deserve at least a casual mention by the mfg. Steve N4LQ ____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00221.html (10,336 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 10:26:27 -0400; Steve (and all): Not to belabor the point, but up until two or three weeks ago when we posted the "what's coming in version 1.370" doc on the Orion section of the www.rfsquared.com website there was; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00243.html (10,719 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 11:45:16 -0500; making Just occurred to me -- you can get mode B out of the Logikey keyers by selecting AccuKeyer emulation. The AccuKeyer is a mode B keyer. My LogiKey CMOS-4 is the first of several keyers I've ow; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00251.html (8,395 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Uhlman" <tuhlman@kimbanet.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 13:39:21 -0400; Ok, now for a stupid question.... What is "mode A" and "mode B"?? I am not a newbie to ham radio and I am not an extra lite either... Been doing CW with iambic key & keyer for almost 20 years now but; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00256.html (9,657 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] band stacking (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 18:31:39 -0500; (1) I find other keyers (MFJ, etc.) have lousy timing, and I 'make mistakes all the time. The Logikey doesn't do that. Besides, I think you can set them to the "A" timing, but am not sure. (2) I neve; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00274.html (15,317 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]