Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+cw\s+testing\s+\/\s+return\s+policy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+cw\s+testing\s+\/\s+return\s+policy\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] cw testing / return policy (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:01:46 +0000; <<<It will make a difference for those who do operate CW, because there are no CW exclusive sub-bands. >>> Unless I missed something there are vast expanses of non-phone freqencies for hams on HF. bu; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00899.html (12,059 bytes)
2. [TenTec] cw testing / return policy (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:15:55 -0400; usually two sides to these things, and I bet Ten Tec has one. I agree, and Thank God TT does not choose to post their side on this reflector every week or two. I truly believe some folks just love to; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00937.html (7,272 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] cw testing / return policy (score: 1): Author: W5vhp@aol.com; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:24:28 EDT; Well, said, Bill. Most all threads get worked-over and over and over. My goodness, people just have way too much time on their hands! Larry W5VHP _______________________________________________ TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00939.html (7,025 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] cw testing / return policy (score: 1): Author: "Caitlyn M. Martin" <mizuhoradio@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:41:04 -0700 (PDT); 50.0-50.1 and 144.0-144.1 are, in fact, CW exclusive. No digital modes allowed. 73, Caity K7VO/8 Caitlyn M. Martin - K7VO http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/k7vo Blog: http://k7vo.blogspot.com ARRL; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00960.html (8,648 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]