Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+d\-104\s+and\s+omni\s+V\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+d\-104\s+and\s+omni\s+V\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] d-104 and omni V (score: 1): Author: w6hv@earthlink.net (Troy Wideman); Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:29:12 -0800; Couldn't agree more with Paul. I use a very similar circuit in my DR-10 ( a "studio" high impedance mic made by Astatic that I bought new back in about '51) with my Omni VI (+3) and I have placed the; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00305.html (13,612 bytes)
22. [TenTec] d-104 and omni V (score: 1): Author: JBeamer@PanAmSat.com (Beamer, Jay); Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 18:31:42 -0500; This subject doesn't have to be difficult. A couple years ago using my Omni V and testing with 4 individuals on the air that know my voice in person. I compared a non-amplified and an amplified D104; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00306.html (13,464 bytes)
23. [TenTec] d-104 and omni V (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:43:24 -0800; John; Great idea! How come we don't have people like you at the FCC and ARRL making intelligent restructuring rules instead of the idiots that did make them? Reid, K7YX The FCC should require that fo; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00307.html (9,010 bytes)
24. [TenTec] d-104 and omni V (score: 1): Author: w5ec@knology.net (Bill Hawkins); Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 18:04:19 -0600; What's a microphone? Bill W5EC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00309.html (8,220 bytes)
25. [TenTec] d-104 and omni V (score: 1): Author: k4cgy_list@yahoo.com (James C. Owen, III); Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:55:15 -0800 (PST); I couldn't agree more with you John. I bought my D-104 before CB existed and have used it on EVERY rig I have ever owned from the DX-100B to the Corsair II and a few Drakes and Kenwoods in between. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00317.html (9,745 bytes)
26. [TenTec] d-104 and omni V (score: 1): Author: Talbot@kmr.LL.mit.edu (George Arthur Talbot); Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:28:25 +1200; --==_76093857==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed George, Well spoken! I greatly enjoyed your treatise and tongue in cheek humor. To: <tentec@contesting.com> In 1948, h; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00331.html (17,436 bytes)
27. [TenTec] d-104 and omni V (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George T. Baker); Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:51:17 -0600; Thanks! Gotta have a little fun, ya' know . . . Tried to stay within a 5 KHz bandwidth, but who could tell? Reception was by slope detection with conventional AM receiver. You tuned off frequency to; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00337.html (9,547 bytes)
28. [TenTec] d-104 and omni V (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson); Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:02:49 -0600; To: <tentec@contesting.com> Just enough to have the bandwidth of AM without the second order modulation products. Sounds super copied exalted carrier on a SSB radio. Used to do that on the bottom of; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00338.html (9,167 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]