Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+eHam\s+charging\s+for\s+Subscription\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:34:43 -0800 (PST)
I just went to check the reviews for the Orion on eHam. I was surprised to find that you can't read most of the reviews until you pay for a subscription. Maybe I'm wrong about this, but that's what i
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00300.html (7,488 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:51:12 -0000
They are in trouble with lack of funding. Anyone who uses eham frequently and likes it should support it. I small donation of even $15 done by enough hams will go a long way to keeping this great ham
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00302.html (8,070 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: Mike Manship <mjmanship@iquest.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:58:10 -0500
Quoting Carl Moreschi <n4py@earthlink.net>: I sent them $50 months ago and they still treat me as a non-subscriber. Mike W9OJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00303.html (8,095 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Emery" <k1uo@prexar.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:12:11 -0500
Their Subscriptions are for one year only...regardless of the amount "donated". Since I use the service quite a lot, I've subscribed the past two years...just renewed a month ago. Larry K1UO Quoting
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00304.html (8,763 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:13:47 -0000
I've not seen any problems in reading the reviews, and just tried to get to the Orion reviews, and had no problems at all. However, I have seen times where you will get a page asking for donations be
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00305.html (10,141 bytes)

6. RE: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:46:45 -0800
Hi Barry, This could be the "kiss of death" for eHam! Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00309.html (7,523 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: "holladayfd" <holladayfd@multipro.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:21:57 -0600
Yep!!! I just removed EHam from my bookmarks--this after sending them $20.00 three weeks ago! Frank, K4VMO -- Original Message -- From: "Adam Farson" <farson@shaw.ca> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00314.html (8,586 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: Ynkedragon@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:26:41 EST
<<This could be the "kiss of death" for eHam!>> Could be, but if the users don't help fund this excellent web site then the plug is likely to get pulled on it anyway. The operating costs for a large
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00315.html (8,219 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:37:58 -0000
Having to eat crow after seeing what you guys are talking about now.... munch munch. I brought up a page and didn't scroll down to see what you were talking about. Sorry I spoke out of turn. I've bee
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00324.html (11,954 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:39:01 -0500
eHam and QSL.NET have been crying "wolf!," er, "donations!" for several years now. Both have made... well if not threats, then suggestions that services might be cut back or terminated if the funding
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00325.html (10,098 bytes)

11. RE: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:30:16 -0500 (EST)
Subscription-based access to internet websites is always a failure unless you have cornered the market on a very specific offering. I work for a company that wrestles with this subject, with great pa
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00329.html (8,959 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:38:15 -0500
Content is why 'consumers' subscribe to ISP's. ISPs would benefit from a tiered pricing structure. Business customers pay for guaranteed bandwidth. Content providers(who don't charge) i.e. mailing li
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00338.html (10,219 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu