Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+eHam\s+reviews\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+eHam\s+reviews\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] eHam reviews.... (score: 1): Author: becnbob@succeed.net (Robert & Rebecca Coykendall); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:53:03 -0700; After extended communications with eHam's Reviews editor, I came to the conclusion that eHam accepts 2nd hand submissions as valid... which violates any sense of fairness... as there have been severa; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00742.html (8,744 bytes)
2. [TenTec] eHam reviews.... (score: 1): Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel); Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 20:17:38 -0400; If I were Scott, I consider withdrawing all advertisements from eHam until they start acting responsibly. Second, if the guy has reservations about TT, TT probably does not want to advertise with the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00743.html (10,699 bytes)
3. [TenTec] eHam reviews.... (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 21:10:58 -0400; Ah, but it's a careful knife edge to walk. Should Ten Tec threaten to pull their ads due to the fact that eHam is permitting obvious (to us) smears as 2nd hand negative ads, then Ten Tec gets accused; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00745.html (12,535 bytes)
4. [TenTec] eHam reviews.... (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 20:16:48 -0700 (PDT); Let's be "fair" - this violates your sense of fairness. Not everyone's. Now here's the good advice! When I look at the reviews, I am underwhelmed by the objectivity and am impressed by the silliness; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00747.html (8,569 bytes)
5. [TenTec] eHam reviews.... (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A Calvin); Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 23:19:43 -0500; C'mon, guys. I think we all need to slow down and take a deep breath. I am a good friend of Phil, NA4M, who is the reviews 'editor' for eham. Phil does this gratis, and he has already deleted the dup; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00748.html (11,155 bytes)
6. [TenTec] eHam reviews.... (score: 1): Author: MW0CDO" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com (MW0CDO); Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 10:53:18 +0100; Hi Bob. Whilst your efforts to uphold the good name of T-T at eham are most laudable, surely any idiot / lid could work out for themselves that there was something fishy going on with the Jupiter rev; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00749.html (7,914 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]