Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+eham\s+centurion\s+0\s+review\s+\-\s+the\s+\"Orion\"\s+Factor\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review - the "Orion" Factor. (score: 1)
Author: wb8yqj@yahoo.com (Don Rasmussen)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Guys, After finding and reading the "centurion 0" eHam review, it seems that the fellow was simply unhappy that he ordered a brand new amplifier from the factory and received an item that was "not
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00432.html (10,482 bytes)

2. [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review - the "Orion" Factor. (score: 1)
Author: wmoorejr@cox.net (Steve M)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:28:16 -0500
Don, Why put a dollar amount on a new piece of gear before it is unacceptable when delivered in faulty condition? Either it is "ready for prime time" or it is not--whether it is an Orion or a cheap t
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00436.html (11,660 bytes)

3. [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review - the "Orion" Factor. (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:15:49 -0400
And it has been said time-and-again and is probably worth repeating...that you have 30-days to evaluate their products at no risk (less shipping); well enough time to figure out if you want the prod
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00446.html (9,630 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu