Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+email\s+to\s+TenTec\s+Service\s+about\s+my\s+Orion\s+I\s+V2\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] email to TenTec Service about my Orion I V2 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernhard Hoidn" <bernhard.hoidn@online.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:56:26 +0200
hallo! I wrote few times about my problems with the Orion I V2. Now I have sent my second email to TenTec, to find a solution. Here are the two emails. Perhaps somebody have the same problems . Bernh
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00343.html (10,181 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] email to TenTec Service about my Orion I V2 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:01:02 -0400
What is the RF gain set at for the sub-receiver? Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: "Bernhard Hoidn" <bernhard.hoidn@online.de> To: "Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00344.html (12,020 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] email to TenTec Service about my Orion I V2 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernhard Hoidn" <bernhard.hoidn@online.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:10:41 +0200
hallo sorry I don&acute;t understand exactly what you mean? 73 Bernhard -- Original Message -- From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Cc:
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00345.html (12,762 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] email to TenTec Service about my Orion I V2 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernhard Hoidn" <bernhard.hoidn@online.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:11:20 +0200
RFGain Main RX 96 and Sub RX 100 What is the RF gain set at for the sub-receiver? Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: "Bernhard Hoidn" <
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00346.html (12,719 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] email to TenTec Service about my Orion I V2 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:13:07 -0400
I only suggested checking the RF gain setting on the Sub-receiver because an RF gain setting of 0 would cause the sub-receiver S meter reaidng to go to maximum. It sounds like that is not the problem
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00347.html (13,565 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] email to TenTec Service about my Orion I V2 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernhard Hoidn" <bernhard.hoidn@online.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:20:40 +0200
you right its not the problem thank you I only suggested checking the RF gain setting on the Sub-receiver because an RF gain setting of 0 would cause the sub-receiver S meter reaidng to go to maximum
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00348.html (14,228 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu