Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+hamfest\s+and\s+new\-ham\s+rigs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+hamfest\s+and\s+new\-ham\s+rigs\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] hamfest and new-ham rigs (score: 1): Author: Peg Haese <haesem@uwplatt.edu>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:35:24 -0600; I was wondering when the subject of $500 new rigs would evolve to good used rigs and now it has. New hams don't really need new rigs, there are lots of decent entry-level used ones available. Sort of; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00628.html (8,434 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] hamfest and new-ham rigs (score: 1): Author: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:02:17 -0500; Is that Yaecomwood as opposed to Tencraft?? :) Ron Wb1hga _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00630.html (6,789 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] hamfest and new-ham rigs (score: 1): Author: W4ABW@aol.com; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:04:35 -0500; Just a tip for people attending hamfests in the Virginia, North and South Carolina, and the WMA. Bill Scruggs often has used equipment and his stuff always works. I have forgotten Bill's call but I b; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00631.html (6,907 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] hamfest and new-ham rigs (score: 1): Author: "Caitlyn M. Martin" <mizuhoradio@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:37:58 -0800 (PST); Hi, Ron, That's Tencraftcomm. (Patcomm is still in business, well... just about, and the PC-500 is still a current radio.) There's always MFJ but we can ignore them pretty safely. OHR? They deserve a; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00633.html (8,007 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] hamfest and new-ham rigs (score: 1): Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:31:02 +0000; Hi Caity, I bought one of the first Patcomms. It was more of a prototype and the built-in keyer could not send code correctly. After bringing it back a couple of times the owner confessed it wasn't r; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00634.html (9,303 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] hamfest and new-ham rigs (score: 1): Author: "ChasW3KC" <w3kc@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:24:01 -0500; re PatcommAlthough their website was still up (last time I checked) I understand they are history. Too bad - nice radios. Frank WB2UJS is a very talented designer. 73 Charles W3KC ___________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00636.html (8,000 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] hamfest and new-ham rigs (score: 1): Author: "Caitlyn M. Martin" <mizuhoradio@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:21:24 -0800 (PST); Hi, Art, and everyone else, I had a PC-9000 (later model) that really wasn't ready for prime time either. Horrible receiver on 6m, birdies all over the place, noisy tuning, but... some neat concepts; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00637.html (9,685 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] hamfest and new-ham rigs (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:23:52 -0600; The web site seems to be gone for Patcomm, and the domain name up for sale. -Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00639.html (7,894 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]