Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+info\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+info\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] info (score: 1): Author: creed@netins.net (clifford L. Reed); Date: Wed Apr 2 16:49:39 2003; Help, I have tried for a year to find a mobile mount for my scout radio, do you have one or know where I can find one? And the answer is no, can you put me on a list in case you come across one? Than; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00047.html (6,352 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Info (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@blomand.net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 19:07:11 -0700; Is the Tentec info still available on this site? 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-06/msg00074.html (6,354 bytes)
3. [TenTec] INFO (score: 1): Author: kf5mc@flash.net (Joseph Pursley); Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 20:27:55 -0500; I realize that this has nothing to do with ten tec, however a lot of talk regarding qrp goes on here and I like QRP. For those who inadvertently bought an SGC 2020, the reason you cant get adequate a; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00291.html (7,024 bytes)
4. [TenTec] INFO (score: 1): Author: talbot@kmrmail.kmr.ll.mit.edu (George Arthur Talbot); Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 12:20:49 +1200 (KST); Joe and all the Ten-Techies, Ten Tec deals with this problem by inserting a 100 ohm resister in both left and right 'channels' of the audio jack. This does two things. It reduces the volume to the he; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00301.html (7,657 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Info (score: 1): Author: cw-hf@juno.com (Rich E. Shaver); Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 06:50:47 EST; Hello all, I just thought of something with Christmas quickly approaching. Unless things have changed at TT, please be advised that if you have friends contemplating giving you TenTec gifts that TenT; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-11/msg00174.html (6,860 bytes)
6. [TenTec] info (score: 1): Author: JOHN <ku3g@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:14:07 -0700 (PDT); Can anyone give me a history of model 540 , tnx 73 john ku3g -- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00879.html (6,512 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Info (score: 1): Author: "Michael - VE3MKX" <mkx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:14:12 -0400; Hi Folks. I picked up a Ten Tec S-30 signalizer at a local Hamfest this past weekend. Are these untis rare ? I checked the net and wasnt able to find much on it. What transceiver was this unit for ?; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00163.html (6,654 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Info (score: 1): Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:43:40 -0700; Hi Mike - The S-30 was an audio amp with filters and speaker in a box to match the very early Ten Tec rigs. I don't know quite which rig it was built to match, but it looks a lot like the Triton I an; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00170.html (7,568 bytes)
9. [TenTec] info (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:52:06 -0400; Hello All , here is another dumb question ........on the OII there is a ucw and a lcw do I use lcw on 40mtrs and lower like LSB ? or do I always use ucw and use lcw to help rx the signal . I am getti; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00212.html (7,165 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] info (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:58:30 -0500; Choose whether you prefer LCW or UCW, and if you get QRM, sometimes you can switch between them and be able to hear better on one. Most of the older ICOM's and Ten-Tec's were LCW-based transceivers,; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00213.html (8,863 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] info (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:03:17 -0600; It makes practically no difference on HF unless you work a mixed mode contact. Mixed mode contacts are halfway common on VHF, but uncommon on HF. Otherwise it depends on which way you prefer signals; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00214.html (8,567 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] info (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:09:11 -0600; John, you can use either lcw or ucw. it depends to me on which way you like to tune in a signal--from the lower to upper tone or vice versa. i like to tune UP so i use lcw on all bands and tune from; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00215.html (8,959 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] info (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:37:27 -0700; Another advantage of LCW is that if you want the tone of the station you're listening to go up, you tune the dial up and vice versa to go down. On UCW, it's just the opposite. I think that's why LCW; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00216.html (9,787 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] info (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:59:45 -0500; This is interesting. While the difference is purely esthetic, I'm used to a Kenwood TS-930S and I *think* it used the equivalent of LCW. But now I'll have to check. I like the audio note to tune as R; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00219.html (11,221 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]