Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+limited\s+Orion\s+reviews\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+limited\s+Orion\s+reviews\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: tlogan7@cox.net (tlogan7@cox.net); Date: Fri Apr 18 17:17:43 2003; Hi folks - Is it my imagination or is the response to the Orion rather subdued? Has anyone set there's down next to a 756 Pro II for A/B comp? I'd love to know any impressions about the two rigs comp; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00468.html (7,635 bytes)
2. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri Apr 18 17:49:11 2003; If propagation over on the US mainland is anything as it is out here near mid-Pacific, there are few signals to work, or compare anything with! Pretty hard to get excited about any rig with the K ind; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00469.html (8,723 bytes)
3. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Fri Apr 18 18:31:57 2003; Make it even more meaningful: An Orion and Omni VI+ A/B comparison. I'd bet there are more Omni VI+ owners here than 756 owners. 73, dale, kg5u (finally, a Ten-Tec-related thread....); /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00473.html (8,626 bytes)
4. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: wb4qda@yahoo.com (John Sheeley); Date: Fri Apr 18 19:14:28 2003; I don't have a pro II to compare it too . If you do I suggest the 1 month trial of the Orion and compare it yourself . I have an Orion . It is an amazing .The receiver is the best I have every heard; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00474.html (9,047 bytes)
5. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Fri Apr 18 19:16:50 2003; I have "set my Orion down by another rig," or actually had rigs brought to my shack for a comparison. The results were quite interesting, to say the least - and the results were very definite when co; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00475.html (9,573 bytes)
6. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: tlogan7@cox.net (tlogan7@cox.net); Date: Fri Apr 18 19:49:20 2003; Dale - I'm sure that is true - I'm one of the Omni VI owners. However, what I am curious about is comparing one 32 bit IF DSP rig to another (ie the 756 PRO II). Since TT is entering the heavy duty D; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00478.html (9,648 bytes)
7. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Fri Apr 18 20:22:40 2003; This reminds me of the day when I received my first Pegasus (July 14 2000), it happened to coincide with one of the worst solar flare/HF blackout events in nearly 10 years. I couldn't hear any signal; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00480.html (8,319 bytes)
8. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Fri Apr 18 21:15:32 2003; AC5E commented "And for those who are interested, if you have two antenna systems, the Orion is essentially two rigs in one box." Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the Orion is completely; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00489.html (8,296 bytes)
9. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Fri Apr 18 21:51:31 2003; 100% Correct ... recall that N9VV confirmed this for us some time ago ... the Orion is not SO2R. <and let me QUICKLY add, neither is any other rig before the TT mojo artists fire up on this post ...; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00490.html (8,427 bytes)
10. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: tjednacz@ieee.org (Thomas Jednacz); Date: Fri Apr 18 23:15:30 2003; Hi Tim, I had a 756 PRO before the Orion and did a side by side comparison. Really no comparison. The Orion filters are cleaner and sharper on SSB, the intermods are better on Orion, more choices of; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00503.html (9,718 bytes)
11. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Sat Apr 19 00:25:24 2003; Exactamente! But, what can be done in the absence of answers to your CQ's on the main radio is to tune the subreceiver for the two or three seconds between CQ's for a new station/mult to work. Defin; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00506.html (8,674 bytes)
12. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: w4wvw@msn.com (Edward Crawford); Date: Sat Apr 19 02:33:03 2003; I hate to hear that the bands are dead. In the last 24 hours, I have worked many DX stations. Maybe not rare DX but DX nonetheless. Mostly just in passing, not very much effort at all, many on the fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00513.html (10,477 bytes)
13. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat Apr 19 07:42:39 2003; with the new gal <rig> and is temporarily blinded. B-) I doubt he's blind...but this will surely make anyone without an Orion relatively deaf: Close In IMD Dynamic Range at 5 kHz Signal Spacing (ARRL; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00517.html (8,265 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]