Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+list\s+opinion\(s\)\s+on\s+Omni\s+VII\s+and\/versus\s+Orion\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 22:34:03 -0500
Folks, may we have a brief discussion of the relative merits of the Omni VII and the Orion? Am thinking of one or the other and would like some input. Thanks and 73, Mike W2IY _______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00006.html (7,515 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 22:54:47 -0500
I have had both check Sherwood testing, Orion test is better has 2 reciever Folks, may we have a brief discussion of the relative merits of the Omni VII and the Orion? Am thinking of one or the other
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00007.html (7,768 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Byron Cordes via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 22:43:05 -0600
I think you are comparing two deferent radio designs,up conversion Omni ll and down conversion The Orion. The Omni ll is more like the Japan manufacturers of the 1980-90s . The Orion turned the manuf
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00008.html (9,386 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:07:02 +0000
What's wrong with using the Orion stock subreceiver for general coverage reception? Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00012.html (11,160 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 08:25:40 +0100
Almost all of Rob Sherwood's test reviews are posted on my web site, here: http://www.dj0ip.de/sherwood-forest/sherwood-xcvr-tests/ I have the OM7 and O2, but I don't have a test of the O1. 73, Rick,
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00013.html (9,482 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 08:29:22 +0100
NOTHING, it is a good receiver, even here in our harsh European bands. Very few users actually operate the radio in a way that they could even tell a difference. Oh, I nearly forgot; there is one dif
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00014.html (11,739 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Martin Sole <hs0zed@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:11:00 +0700
Indeed, absolutely nothing. My 565 Orion was my main radio for about 6 or 7 years and there are still things about it I miss on the K3 that replaced it. Chasing dx pileups I never found the standard
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00015.html (12,015 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: MadScientist <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:42:44 -0600
My two cents: I have had a dozen Orions and maybe 5 Orion 2s. I buy them, repair them, use them for a while to enjoy them, test them then sell them. The Orion radios are VERY easy to service (all but
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00018.html (13,303 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Byron Cordes via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:47:12 -0600
Nothing wrong with the stock second rx for general rx in the Orion but do you really want one in your contest quality Ham Radio ? I think Henry was trying to say you cant cover all the frequency with
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00021.html (11,156 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 19:08:33 +0000
That seems a bit harsh. I was a serious contester in a previous life and used that stock second receiver all the time from 2004-2008. Yes, the stock subreceiver had some issues with very strong signa
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00022.html (9,054 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Stan" <w4ag@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:34:08 -0500
Gary, If I send you the A9 board that I mangled trying to replace electrolytics can you repair it for your going rate and return it? Is your qrz.com address OK? Thanks, Stan, W4AG My two cents: I hav
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00023.html (14,819 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: MadScientist <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:37:34 -0600
Yes to both questions! Gary _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00025.html (16,352 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:26:31 +0100
The Orion (565) was never ever tested with the optional INRAD 600Hz filter (designed by W4ZV) . This 4-pole crystal is the perfect roofing filter with minimal Group Delay.  6 or 8-pole filtering, use
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00058.html (16,261 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:14:29 +0000
Great comments Mark! For many years I was very active on 160M cw and I found that the Orion, Orion II and RX366 receivers differed somewhat in their ability to handle s9++ signals, which were encount
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00059.html (19,171 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:37:13 +0100
Tnx, Still own 3 TT ORIONs here: - Old 2002 version, recently acquired(swapped for my OII), heavily used (has at least different PCB circuit tracks around the DC power input) using fw 1.375b - New bo
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00060.html (21,175 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:08:13 -0600
You noted some very interesting filter characteristics regarding the Orion transceivers, Mark. One thing you mention is that the DSP filters may have skirts that are too steep, leading to other artif
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00061.html (23,998 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:12:57 +0100
Hi Kim, Yes, on my SDR Perseus I have lowered them to the minimal value (32) to make it perform better. For the ORION that is not necessary. However, I did experiment with taps on the OII a bit. You
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00063.html (25,551 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Martin Sole <hs0zed@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:09:31 +0700
I still have an Orion and I still like it a lot, even though it's not without its faults and could have used more development. With regard to the filter taps it is unfortunate that when set to anythi
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00065.html (23,352 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:12:50 +0100
Just to be clear on this; the ORION does not require lowering the filter taps setting at all. First its basic filtershape at 199 is already perfectly analog-like round shaped (see my previous weblink
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00066.html (27,299 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Martin Sole <hs0zed@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:11:15 +0700
Hi, I just used Spectrogram 14 fed with line audio to the pC sound card. I get the same shape you do at 300Hz and at 100Hz similar. In SSB at 2700Hz bandwidth its a different story, very steep skirts
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00067.html (25,164 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu