Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+meaningful\s+test\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+meaningful\s+test\s+results\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] meaningful test results (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 15:15:40 EDT; The ARRL labs reports are certainly good as far as they go. But the bare numbers don't go far enough. Steve's suggestion of trying to copy CW through an artificial QRM generator would help but I woul; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00011.html (7,704 bytes)
2. [TenTec] meaningful test results (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 06:07:38 -0400; The important thing to remember is ARRL testing is getting better, and they are willing to improve it even more IF we can give them reasons for changes. Even a year ago, they measured and published; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00031.html (9,837 bytes)
3. [TenTec] meaningful test results (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 11:09:11 EDT; Tom's suggstion of a three tone test would be better than what we have - but in my experience engineering departments get awfully good at designing products to pass tests. Just as some testing organi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00033.html (8,164 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]