Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+mike\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+mike\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:45:23 -0500; The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading and such largely impact the response and more importantly the polar response. For that reason I prefer the 709 in place of t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00382.html (12,113 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:59:22 -0400 (EDT); I agree with Bob's remarks. The two microphones use the same element, but achieve different results. Doug WD4LNW The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading nd such lar; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00383.html (12,854 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:33:27 -0400; 708 has more lowin more bass I agree with Bob's remarks. The two microphones use the same element, but achieve different results. Doug WD4LNW The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, ve; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00384.html (13,041 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 19:27:36 -0400; hear my 707 on 1997 at 800 pm 708 has more lowin more bass I agree with Bob's remarks. The two microphones use the same element, but achieve different results. Doug WD4LNW The configuration and not t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00388.html (14,112 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 18:39:19 -0500; I use the 707 with the Omni VII and always get "great audio" reports. Typical values: SSB TX BW 3000 TX Roll Off 250 TX EQ 0 dB Speech Processor 40% MIC GAIN 55% * *Value dependant on Hardware Mike g; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00389.html (14,996 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 19:47:06 -0400 (EDT); Like I mentioned in an earlier post, there are many variables in choosing a mic to suit your needs. That is why I have about 2 dozen different microphones in my recording studio. Some voices sound gr; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00390.html (15,256 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 21:10:38 -0400; Try a 709 I use the 707 with the Omni VII and always get "great audio" reports. Typical values: SSB TX BW 3000 TX Roll Off 250 TX EQ 0 dB Speech Processor 40% MIC GAIN 55% * *Value dependant on Hardw; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00391.html (15,531 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:31:48 -0500; I have 2 of the 709's. They too get "great audio" reports...... but with different radio settings than used with the 707 on the Omni VII. Typically I have one 709 on the Argonaut VI and the other 709; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00392.html (16,438 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]