Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+omni\s+purchase\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+omni\s+purchase\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] omni purchase (score: 1): Author: "David" <dns@cablespeed.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 21:30:00 -0800; I'm thinking of buying an omni 6, rather than a 6+. I've read the e-ham reviews and it appears there really isn't that much to gain by getting one with the updates (ver.1 etc) and that the main thing; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00206.html (6,545 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] omni purchase (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:16:09 -0500; The NR feature on the + is worth the cost if you are a cw operator. If not cw, then it really doesn't matter that much. N4LQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00207.html (7,469 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] omni purchase (score: 1): Author: "N2YZS" <N2YZS@mantlelamp.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:04:31 -0500; The DSP noise reduction in Option 1 or 3 is well worth having! I had an option 3 and bought a plain VI as a backup. Same fine receiver, but I was lost without the DSP noise reduction. Bought the Opti; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00210.html (8,233 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] omni purchase (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:01:38 -0600; The noise reduction circuit in the 6+ makes a great difference. I wouldn't buy a radio without it. It is better that any rice burner I ever tried. I love my 6+ and I am only selling it to buy an Orio; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00230.html (8,506 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]