Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+omni\s+v\s+short\s+dits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+omni\s+v\s+short\s+dits\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:30:08 -0400; A friend of mine has an Omni V and he is trying to use a bug however the dits are being chopped so badly that he can't use it. I've never had a TenTec rig that chopped dits like this one. I've hear h; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00760.html (6,643 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: Don Watters <ve1bn@eastlink.ca>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:19:01 -0300; Hi Steve - Any way he can set the keying compensation? I found my Paragon II needed about 15 mS delay to give a smooth keying characteristic. No shortened makes or clicks. Worth a try if he can set i; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00761.html (7,985 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:42:38 -0500; Don't know what it sounds like to the guy sending, but bugs can be set so the "dit" contact is just barely touching - barely brushing the 2 contacts together..... Can he adjust it to make it better?; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00763.html (7,957 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:57:51 -0400; He sez it sounds the same in his sidetone. I had him crank the dits all the way closed then just slightly back it off the contact but still it was a ragged, chopped dit. I'm sure he knows what he's d; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00764.html (10,111 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:06:12 -0400; Keying compensation? Delay? Sounds like a line from the K3 manual. I suppose if he had a keyer he could crank up the weight but I'm not sure the ole boy owns one. He's a true, blue cw op! Bug only! B; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00765.html (10,104 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:28:56 +0000; Well, it's been a while since I had the Omni V, but I remember some keying problems with the VOX on. The dit weight almost touching (anything) should not affect the dit length one way or another. But; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00767.html (8,509 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:35:04 -0400; Paddle jack on an Omni V? Help me out here. Well, it's been a while since I had the Omni V, but I remember some keying problems with the VOX on. The dit weight almost touching (anything) should not a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00768.html (8,960 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:44:16 -0400; I've been looking for you on 40m! Yes. I recently bought a used Omni 6 Plus and found out that it had a 'timing problem'. When sending the letter 'U', the first dot would be shortened from 20ms to ab; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00769.html (9,655 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: Don Watters <ve1bn@eastlink.ca>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:45:26 -0300; Whatever, Steve. Please don't take me for a fool. Guess I am just a lucky fellow with a CMOS Superkeyer 3 which can compensate keying in various rigs. Ever try one? Was a cmcl op, used a bug for 40 y; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00770.html (11,930 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:53:23 -0400; Don, That's interesting. But I can't quite understand what adding delay via keying compensation does for the radio? Reason it's puzzeling is in test I've done this week, I found the Omni 6 has a 12ms; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00771.html (9,989 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:04:55 +0000; Well, after ten years or so memory gets tricky but the paddles plugged into a mini stereo phone jack on the right side of the rig, facing the back. Said jack going to the internal keyer, if my memory; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00773.html (9,267 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:17:20 -0400; Yes sir. I had a K3 Super Duper CMOS here for some time. I sold it because I didn't like the mode B emulation. Other than that, it's ok. Listening to the weight vs. "keying compensation" adjustment i; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00774.html (15,297 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:22:36 -0500; "The Orion is quite unstable at speeds over about 42 wpm . . . . Ralph Nader will write a book about it soon! Tommy, is that with the internal keyer, external, or either one? 73, Duane -- Duane Calvi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00776.html (11,103 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams@telus.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:28:56 -0700; Houston we have a problem. All this talk about the Omni V may confuse some. So a point of clarity - the Omni V does NOT have a built in keyer?? Hence no jack for the paddles. I believe you may have i; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00778.html (9,682 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 22:16:15 -0400; Haw! Actually I don't think I would read it because I've about had enough! I have two external keyers, a PC that uses an open collector transistor for keying, and an old DGM keyboard that uses a reed; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00779.html (12,790 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:48:17 -0400; I am using cw type and cw get and just got through testing the Orion at 52 wpm and did not notice anything wrong with the sending at all. I went down to 42 wpm and the sent cw was perfect, so I am no; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00781.html (12,729 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:54:32 -0400; Now how did this go from the Omni V to the Orion? Hey Toby....Crank that baby up to 68 wpm and listen close for some odd dits! problem writes: _______________________________________________ TenTec m; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00782.html (13,614 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams@telus.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:59:25 -0700; I tried Steve but no one's listening .... 73, Rick VE7TK Now how did this go from the Omni V to the Orion? Hey Toby....Crank that baby up to 68 wpm and listen close for some odd dits! Steve N4LQ ____; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00784.html (8,238 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:04:00 -0400; Toby.... Interesting!! I've got two Orions here and they both do the same. Were you watching the RF output waveform with a scope? The sidetone sounds excellent at high speeds, it's just that on mine,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00785.html (14,082 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:20:17 +0000; Rick: you are correct and I am wrong. The Omni V does not have the internal keyer. And neither I nor the fellow who could not get his bug to work with the V can remember what the problem was. Field D; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00787.html (8,576 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]