Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+omni\s+v\s+short\s+dits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+omni\s+v\s+short\s+dits\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: David McClafferty <ve1adh@yahoo.ca>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:11:24 -0400 (EDT); I would dearly love to copy at high speed. I started learning the code at about age 8, gave it up in my late teens, got back at it at age 27 and passed my 10 WPM test. Got my Advanced (15WPM) at age; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00825.html (18,759 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:41:19 -0400; Hi Dave, This reflector is not the right forum to talk about copying code maybe, so I'll make a few comments and then drop the subject. However if you want to discuss it, I'm certainly open to doing; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00829.html (12,543 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:34:18 -0400; Hi Mike..... Yep. By the way I understand what happens, I would say you nailed it!! Some of the things you read on this reflector, if you let it, certainly could drive one to drink. Tom - W4BQF to ke; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00837.html (26,630 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:12:49 -0000; I deduce from your mail that you're not overly impressed by Idiom Press and their K3 keyer! I don't own a K3 and have no relationship with Idiom Press. I do use a Samson ETM9 which is a Logikey circu; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00840.html (31,593 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:41:48 -0400; Bob: I think what you're trying to say is: Compensation is consistent with speed while weighting is not. I would have to see proof of this on a K3. I disagree with your dot only comment. Any keyer I'; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00848.html (36,713 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:38:16 -0000; Steve Both keying compensation and keying weight are constants. Compensation is a constant time period added to every character element, whereas Weight is a constant ratio. The time compensating effe; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00854.html (41,230 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:20:32 -0400; Well no wonder I couldn't send good on that thing! Maybe the compensaton was throwing my mental timming out of sync. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00858.html (46,376 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:58:02 -0400; Don't you need to set the pendulum dit stop screw to increase the weighting? Making the contact gap smaller will not make the dits longer, I think. I have to go back to my bug adjustment notes, but t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00879.html (12,077 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 48
Page: [1] [2] [3]