Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+orion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+orion\s*$/: 272 ]

Total 272 documents matching your query.

61. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: kastigar@swbell.net (Matt & Sue Kastigar); Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:55:50 -0600; To me, the 'base' hardware performance is first and of top priority. I realize there are physical and economic limitations as to what can be done, but on the other hand, $3300 is a lot of money. I lo; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00657.html (8,240 bytes)
62. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: ghamilto@direct.ca (Gord Hamilton ve7on); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:43:02 -0800; I feel Ten-Tec is on the right track with their looks and performance goals but please make the radio deliver 150 watts to the antenna. If the rig is only 100 watts I might buy one. If it is 150 watt; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00689.html (7,924 bytes)
63. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:02:25 -0500; May I ask why? My calculator shows about 1.7 db difference between 100 and 150 watts, about one quarter of an S-unit. Driving an amplifier? My 100 watt Omni drives the TT Centurion (2 X 3-500) to ful; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00691.html (8,196 bytes)
64. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: caitlynmaire@earthlink.net (Caitlyn Martin); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:23:52 -0500; The 50% increase in power representes all of about 1.4db, or a barely noticable increase in signal strength. It won't even show up on an S-meter. Why is the extra 50 watts so important? I really don'; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00700.html (8,178 bytes)
65. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: jhurry@austin.rr.com (Dudley Hurry); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:15:50 -0600; Some of the amplifiers require more than 100 watts to drive, and some times the input circuits are not as finely tuned as they should be, particularly on 17 and 12 meters, so the extra power can be i; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00706.html (9,069 bytes)
66. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:26:52 -0500; The only real value would be in "driving power" for an amplifier. Some triode amps have less gain than others and need more drive for max output. Perry w8au; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00709.html (8,266 bytes)
67. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: k4sqr@juno.com (Jim Miller); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:57:09 -0500; Caity & readers; 3-500Z amplifiers require 125 watts of drive for 1500 watts output. This could be the reason for 150 final requests. Of course there are some amps that require 200 watts drive, but t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00710.html (8,481 bytes)
68. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:33:17 -0500; If you have an amp that runs say 1200 watts output with approximately 100 watts drive, then that extra 50 watts should be enough to get 1500 watts out. If the amp stayed perfectly linear, which it wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00725.html (10,627 bytes)
69. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: WA2PVK@prodigy.net (WILLIAM F MANSEY); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:37:58 -0500; Why buy an Orion? Why not wait until the Ten-Tec Hamfest. Someone posted a message earlier that Ten-Tec is going to be giving Orions away to everyone who attends! :-) Actually - I suppose that I will; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00417.html (6,703 bytes)
70. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A Calvin); Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:55:41 -0600; Drat, and this is the year I decided to skip Dayton and just go to Ham-Com. Hey, Scott, Ham-Com in Dallas had a great DXing session last year - might be a good place to show off a new rig! 73, Duane; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00281.html (7,421 bytes)
71. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: k9ot@mhtc.net (Paul DeWitte K9OT); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:23:40 -0600; With the new Orion in the works, will that devalue the Omni 6 so that I can aford one? I have thought that it was about time for a new model to appear. 73 Paul k9ot; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00303.html (7,365 bytes)
72. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: k9ot@mhtc.net (Paul DeWitte K9OT); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:51:53 -0600; On the subject of features for the new rig I see no reason to have VHF/UHF in a HF rig as you can only listen to one band at a time (unles you have dual independent recieve) anyway. A lot of the all; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00313.html (7,809 bytes)
73. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:15:35 -0500; I'd love to see a computer interface that used an Ethernet port instead of a serial port. Imagine putting your radio in a remote location, like a (SECURED!!!) building next to your tower, running one; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00314.html (8,913 bytes)
74. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:31:28 -0600; Paul: I fully agree. I'm an avid HF'er and work EME, MS, & tropo on VHF & UHF. I've found that may of the "all band, all mode" rigs suffer in RX performance, especially on VHF & UHF. I say if one wan; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00316.html (9,129 bytes)
75. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:53:59 -0800 (PST); I also agree that the all in one boxes come up short, but for an additional reason. They don't do you a lot of good if you need (Ok want)to monitor several VHF/UHF bands simultaneously. Their economi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00317.html (10,714 bytes)
76. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: pywacker@fuse.net (Jim); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:12:00 -0500; But why do we have to expect a one box as coming up short?; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00327.html (11,959 bytes)
77. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: wswezig@bellsouth.net (wswezig@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:38:08 -0500; Ten Tec informs target price to be $3300, IF DSP, dual receive, two versions...one to match Omni VI+ era face plate and another to match Titan II. Rig is to be revealed at Dayton and ready for delive; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00387.html (7,991 bytes)
78. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: Rick Tyler" <rp.tyler@worldnet.att.net (Rick Tyler); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:42:46 -0500; versions...one to match Omni VI+ era face plate and another to match Titan II. Rig is to be revealed at Dayton and ready for delivery late Fall, 2002. Hmmm . . . I figured they'd have a new color sc; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00397.html (8,231 bytes)
79. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: w2agn@pobox.com (W2AGN); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:54:14 -0500; nfo/tentec -- Any of you folks with an "in" at Ten Tec know the status of the 516 QRP rig? -- John L Sielke W2AGN w2agn@pobox.com http://www.qsl.net/w2agn Trustee: W3IYQ; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00398.html (8,282 bytes)
80. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1): Author: wo8l@att.net (wo8l@att.net); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:20:35 +0000; Hi, O.K., we've added a VCR/DVD/TV combination and a beer tap. Also, since everybody is so worried about the color, Ten Tec has decided to paint it any color you want...like when you buy a new car. T; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00400.html (8,192 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]