Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ot\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ot\s*$/: 115 ]

Total 115 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:02:07 -0500; The speed using dashes is WPM = dashes in 4.8 seconds (not 1.2) Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net> To: "TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00178.html (9,363 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1): Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:42:09 -0600; WPM = Dots per second / 1.2 it then follows that WPM = Dashes per second / 0.6 _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00179.html (7,644 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:17:02 -0500; Dashes are longer than dots, so you will have more time for the same amount of dashes. I have used the following fomula for 30 years. WPM = dots per 2.4 seconds WPM = dashes per 4.8 seconds Set your; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00180.html (8,765 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:42:47 -0500; Hi John, What got me up there was listening to the ARRL cw practice as they start out fast & get slower. That really helped me a lot. Gary ka1j _______________________________________________ TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00185.html (8,637 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1): Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:20:55 -0600; Thanks to Carl, N4PY for correcting my errors. The correct equation is WPM = 2.4 X Dots per second or WPM = 4.8 X Dashes per second Stated another way, WPM = Number of Dots in 2.4 seconds or Number o; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00189.html (7,787 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:00:35 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00194.html (10,490 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:10:22 -0500; I'm not one of the big dogs in copying CW. I did get a certificate for copying 45 wpm back in the early 90's but put my equipment away after moving into a basement apartment in Chicago after getting; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00199.html (9,189 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:53:31 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00205.html (10,264 bytes)
29. [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:09:10 -0500; Here is a little tip we just learned. My son kc2iyg just bought a laptop computer used. The computer was a good deal but it stunk to high heaven from tobacco smoke . We took a chance , he first wiped; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00032.html (7,590 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Sumner <jdos2@att.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:49:58 -0500; Careful of anything with rubber- the ozone created from the ionizer will destroy it. Friend of mine owns a bicycle shop. He's strongly health conscious and bought an ionizer. We've bought hundreds of; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00033.html (7,851 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:19:40 -0500; John and Mike, Thanks for the tip. However, I have two concerns: First, ozone from the 'Ionizer' is quite reactive. It can damage stuff like rubber (to say nothing of your lungs). I have seen publish; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00034.html (8,636 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:41:36 -0600; I have a 51J with a white panel. It came from the estate of a smoker. It was brown. I found only something with lots of ammonia took the grunge off the panel and knobs and I'm not sure how much of th; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00035.html (8,399 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:01:18 -0500; Hi carter! the notebook actually smelled worse than it looked no yellow coating after we were finished we put our noses up to the plug connections , keypad , battery comp etc all smelled much much be; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00037.html (10,036 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:02:51 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00038.html (9,755 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:35:33 -0500; HI Carter , I took the time to reread you email a little closer. Are you saying that the air cleaner Ionizers are Hazardous to your health ? -- Original Message -- From: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00039.html (10,603 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Eugene Klingler" <n8zx@hughes.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:07:07 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00040.html (12,196 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:19:38 -0500; In a word, yes... Many states, including California, have issued warnings against ozone generators: <http://by104fd.bay104.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/dasp/EN/rte___10000003.asp#_edn15>. And here is a bl; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00046.html (10,206 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:10:20 -0500; Not only does ozone attack rubber, but also most plastics. Even coax. Ever wonder why tie-wraps outside break so soon ? (except the special ones) Stay away from it. Its also corrosive....so if you ge; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00069.html (11,608 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:14:05 -0500; I'm not Carter obviously, but yes, he is right. When I worked for Kodak we made copiers, and we had to massively filter the output cooling air so that all ozone was removed. It is law. The studies sh; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00070.html (12,899 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:36:36 -0500; Ok I admit it I am a knuckle dragger ... Is that how Ionizers made to clean air work by creating Ozone ? John -- Original Message -- From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com> To: "Discussion of T; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00073.html (14,300 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]