Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+paragon\s+II\s+Pass\s+band\s+tuning\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+paragon\s+II\s+Pass\s+band\s+tuning\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] paragon II Pass band tuning (score: 1): Author: john ferro <foxbat426@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:50:50 -0400; i recently purchased a really nice clean paragon II - going through the radio now and must say its a really nice radio - nice receive, good ergonomics. a couple of things i notice in my short time wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00236.html (7,272 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] paragon II Pass band tuning (score: 1): Author: john ferro <foxbat426@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:09:12 -0400; ok correction - the radio only has the 6.0 and 2.4 khz filtyers installed - the PBT is working with the 2.4 khz filter, but not with the 6.0 khz filter - is this normal??> From: foxbat426@hotmail.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00237.html (9,088 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] paragon II Pass band tuning (score: 1): Author: Joe Roberts <jroberts@io.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 01:33:12 -0400; This is correct...the PBT does NOT function with the 6.0 filter. Man, that 6.0 filter provides some easy listening SSB when conditions permit. I put in an INRAD 2.1 and that filter sounds great also.; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00238.html (7,896 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] paragon II Pass band tuning (score: 1): Author: w5ot@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:10:10 -0400; I agree with Joe.? See below.? I had an Omni V, traded it for an Omni VI.? Bought a Paragon 2, soon sold the Omni VI, as I no longer contest competitively.? Really like the Paragon 2 for its clear re; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00249.html (9,433 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]