Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+poor\s+audio\s+on\s+OMNI\-V\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: yash@aol.com
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:12:35 -0400
?? I talked to the guy I just bought the OMNI-V from. His story is this. He operates 99% of the time? cw on 80. He decided to go to 17 ssb one day and found the problem I have ,very distorted audio.
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00452.html (7,635 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:30:36 -0400
Sorry, I tuned in late and missed most of the correspondence on this issue, so pardon me if it has already been addressed... ..but just going by the very simple, one sentence description of the probl
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00453.html (7,262 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:58:15 -0600
Sounds bad on receive. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00455.html (8,489 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:53:26 +0000
Before sending it to Ten-Tec, you really should find out what that local guy did to "fix" the rig. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00456.html (7,272 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: yash@aol.com
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:24:15 -0400
Jerry ?what is the pin1 issue? ? the problem is on receive audio. dale wt4t Sounds bad on receive. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00457.html (9,167 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: yash@aol.com
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:26:13 -0400
Barry ?from what I was told ,he tried to set up the bfo adj's ,but didn't have test gear up to the task. dale Before sending it to Ten-Tec, you really should find out what that local guy did to "fix"
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00458.html (7,996 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:01:52 -1000
Test gear needed to adjust BFO crystal oscillator frequencies in Omni VI (and I am guessing also Omni V) Method 1, simplest: 1 eA frequency counter with resolution and accuracy down to about 10 Hz a
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00459.html (8,699 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: John Graves <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:36:53 -0400
If I may jump in with a question. I have a jupiter but my Drake 2B rcvr might need this, after I recap it. I have a MFJ 259B antenna tester, which will work as a frequency counter that does resolve t
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00461.html (10,206 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:28:49 -0600
In some Tentec radios there is a problem combining PTT return and microphone return and shield return, going to the PC board, not to the case and that injects RF into the audio board. The cure as I r
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00463.html (9,110 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:42:08 -0600
Resolution is distinct from accuracy. What is the precision of the counter's clock? It can be as bad as 100 ppm which is a 100 Hz error at 1 MHz or 900 Hz at 9 MHz which is disastrous when aligning a
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00464.html (11,070 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:47:02 -1000
Try it and see if you get a count. I don't think you could damage anything by trying. If the counter can handle 5 V P-P, then there is probably no way you'll ever damage the counter by placing a pic
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00466.html (9,927 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: John Graves <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:12:04 -0400
Jerry, The manual claims 1 ppm at room temperature. It is an old (or at least semi-old) MFJ piece of equipment. But if it is 10 times worse than spec, it sounds as though it is close enough to bring
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00467.html (9,739 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:31:47 -0600
10 ppm at 9 MHz is 90 Hz. I thought the object of the task was to resolve the difference between 200 and 300 Hz from the filter corner. A potential error of 90 Hz is nearly all of that. 1 ppm takes c
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00468.html (10,447 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:10:12 -0500
Yea, perhaps he can un-fix it. I seem to do a lot of that. Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00471.html (9,396 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:17:45 -0500
My reply to this, if one doesn't have a frequency counter capable of 1 Hz or better resolution and proper low capacity compensated probes, then they best leave the cover screws in place and stay out
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00472.html (10,912 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu