Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+poor\s+harsh\s+audio\s+on\s+OMNI\-V\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:03:05 -0500
One thing not ruled out is a defective filter in the IF. This along with other alignment issues can contribute to unsatisfactory audio. 73 Bob K4TAX _______________________________________________ Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00448.html (10,426 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:19:05 -0600
True but if the response curve was run manually or with an audio spectrum analyzer like a PSK31 program, as I suggested a couple times, that ailing filter would have been discovered. We haven't exact
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00449.html (9,582 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:30:35 -1000
Someone not interested in SSB operation could have put a 1.8 kHz filter in for the "wide" default 9 MHz filter. (I am guessing the Omni V filter selection scheme is very similar to the Omni VI, if I
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00450.html (10,668 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: yash@aol.com
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:51:52 -0400
Ken ?all the filters are in the right slots, borrowed a 2.4 and subed it in the proper slot,no change. dale wt4t Someone not interested in SSB operation could have put a 1.8 kHz filter in for the "wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00451.html (11,167 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:53:00 -0600
Omni V and VI use the same filters and frequencies as Corsair and Corsair II. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00454.html (11,289 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:35:28 -0400
Not only that, but an SSB contester might never care to listen to a signal any wider than 1.8 kHz and put such a filter in the wide position on purpose, as I have done. I don't care a darn about "low
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00460.html (12,243 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Jim M." <jmiller1706@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:33:12 -0400
Could this be a DSP noise blanker or noise reduction induced distortion? The O-II (depending on the DSP version) can exhibit some audio distortion from the digital signal processing if NB and or NR i
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00469.html (12,801 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:59:01 -0500
I probably repair 5 or 6 of these units per year. I'd say 4 out of 5 have been "peaked & tweaked" for better performance by an unknowing operator. The result is a call to Bob and a package arriving a
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00470.html (11,362 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: John Farler <k4avx1@windstream.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:36:40 -0500
Yes, check the noise blanker and make certain it's all the way ccw. Another trouble maker is the squelch control which will squeeze the audio. Mine has changed over the years to the point where it do
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00479.html (8,986 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu